Yeah, I have read it. He does to the headlines what the journalist class does to the headlines whenever attacking straight white males. Gamergate was always the side that was saying if you don't like it, have a thick skin, stop using relational aggression via moderation, and move the fuck on. Instead, we're moderating to protect precious feelings. I am more annoyed by imp haters than imp.
Where? Dom has a long history of moderating anti-Jewish stuff much more strictly than he does anti-woman stuff.
Having a history of that isn't what is objectionable, nor is having blindspots. It's that imp is weaksauce and moderating that crap just comes off as thin-skinned like the lefties and being on reddit. I thought we were here because we don't need mommy moderator. I've run into 14 year olds who're more offensive and bigger credible threats.
Anyway.
Dude. It's clear as day. There's a ton of "don't name the jew" stormf*g wink and nods in many front page topics. Or comments about last names, noses and Hypens. I mean, we all know what the fuck that means. Is it just not bannable as long as you don't say jew or jewish? Because that is what it looks like to me. Go look at the witcher casting director topic. There's a whole comment chain dancing around accusing her of being jewish and part of some jewish conspiracy. (I don't think that, myself. I'm just pointing out, it's there, and I don't see a chain of bans and deleted comments.)
There's a ton of "don't name the jew" stormf*g wink and nods in many front page topics. Or comments about last names, noses and Hypens. I mean, we all know what the fuck that means.
That's extremely indirect compared to what Imp posts on a regular basis. People "name the woman" all day without getting banned either.
I am more annoyed by imp haters than imp.
You just agree with him so you are defending him (or perhaps more likely, have common enemies). You aren't some crusader for free speech. If you were, you wouldn't have defended Rumble censorship. You aren't fooling me with your bullshit. Try crusading against R16 instead of sucking off a mentally ill retard next time. I get the feeling someone who leads with REEEEing about Holobunga deniers isn't going to attack R16 with much zeal though. Maybe the desire to save face will carry you.
And there we have it. You're the anti here so everyone else must be a fan of his. News flash. Gamergate happened because of feminism and feminism is built upon pandering to western women. How that association ever broke down for you is amazing to me. Free speech itself is in endangered most by western cultured women. This is the statistical reality when that group is the one that most often responds on surveys that hatespeech should be illegal and offending people should be criminal.
You go from "WHeRe?! ThAT DoESn'T HAppEN!!11" to "Oh yeah, that's okay, because they're coy about it."
Get fucking real. Everything is just a 1-step-removed deflection or delaying tactics where you play dumb and shuffle the goal post. Like, I've literally had an argument on KIA2 in the last 2 weeks about the holocaust being real with someone who was insistent it was all fake. Insisting it was nothing more than internment work camps. For fuck sake. It runs rampant. But holy god don't anyone dare point out that our culture is treating western women better than western men. Even with the suicide statistics, homelessness statistics and family court statistics there to back it up. Or literally gendered views on things like rape requiring a dick to commit. Or the sentencing gap on pedophilia. God forbid. That makes me an imp dick rider!
TheImp has nothing to do with OG GamerGate. He is a new fag. The feminists at the heart of GamerGate like Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian are overwhelmingly pro-trans. Some of them even are trans like Wu and Nick Nyberg. The idea that a tranny-lover who sounds just like them whining about "TERFs" all day, is somehow "carrying on the legacy of GamerGate" is beyond farcical.
Free speech itself is in endangered most by western cultured women. This is the statistical reality when that group is the one that most often responds on surveys that hatespeech should be illegal and offending people should be criminal.
Do you mean the "Western cultured" women in charge of the ADL? Public opinion has little to do with public policy, assuming for arguments sake that your claim is even correct.
You go from "WHeRe?! ThAT DoESn'T HAppEN!!11" to "Oh yeah, that's okay, because they're coy about it."
I didn't move any goal posts. Like I said, Dom would let you say the same things about women that they are saying about Jews there, but that's not the type of comment TheImp was banned for.
But holy god don't anyone dare point out that our culture is treating western women better than western men. Even with the suicide statistics, homelessness statistics and family court statistics there to back it up. Or literally gendered views on things like rape requiring a dick to commit. Or the sentencing gap on pedophilia. God forbid.
You are free to talk about that stuff, and plenty of people do without getting banned. What is it with your grandstanding, histrionic bullshit? You barely even participate here.
That makes me an imp dick rider!
"or perhaps more likely, have common enemies"
You really should have quit when you were less far behind.
TheImp has nothing to do with OG GamerGate. He is a new fag. The feminists at the heart of GamerGate like Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian are overwhelmingly pro-trans. Some of them even are trans like Wu and Nick Nyberg. The idea that a tranny-lover who sounds just like them whining about "TERFs" all day, is somehow "carrying on the legacy of GamerGate" is beyond farcical.
Where did I ever say those people were anti-trans? The only thing I had to say about transsexuals is that they're a protected class and the R16 protection doesn't seem to apply to them the same way it seems to apply for women. It is easier to trip an R16 ban for talking shit about women as a class then it is to talk shit about trannies as a class.
Does that clarification help you stop lashing out or do you need to take a nap first?
Do you mean the "Western cultured" women in charge of the ADL? Public opinion has little to do with public policy, assuming for arguments sake that your claim is even correct.
Public policy is downstream from culture. Every political science persona with any scrap of correctness or notoriety has pointed this out. The stand alone complex comes before organization and indoctrination, not the inverse.
These claims are correct. Nobody in academia disputes these findings. If anything, they use the findings to further vilify straight white males for being all the isms and ists. Gleefully. Rather than refute.
I didn't move any goal posts. Like I said, Dom would let you say the same things about women that they are saying about Jews there, but that's not the type of comment TheImp was banned for.
You acted like it wasn't real and you can't get away with it. Then you pretty much said my examples were valid examples except for the fact that the comments are made with a wink and a nod. You condoned it because it was done in a sly way. Frankly, that's bullshit.
I don't think Dom should be banning anybody for R16 is my main contention, short of it being a risk to this site being shut down. Even that aside, no, Imp is clearly under more scrutiny simply by virtue of being himself and having a history of previous bans. I've seen plenty of his commentary. He's absolutely harmless. Like seriously, do you ever think you can put "Proud supporter of gamergate" and get hired by most of the fortune 500? Definitely not. So who are we trying to impress?
Either way, equal enforcement... clever wording and dogwhistles aside, or no enforcement. Picking winners and losers isn't a good look.
Do what I do. Argue with dumb viewpoints, or move on.
You are free to talk about that stuff, and plenty of people do without getting banned. What is it with your grandstanding, histrionic bullshit? You barely even participate here.
What should it matter? It's not worth my time to live here like some people. I was there for week 1 of gamergate. For the subreddit's original incarnation too. Toasted my gaming developer career trying to resist woke's take over IRL. I've bled enough, thanks.
But anyway, if you are worried about participation... maybe not try to gatekeep people based upon the activity level you think is appropriate? :)
or perhaps more likely, have common enemies"
You coached your language, congratulations, that somehow makes you immune from the obvious accusations you were making. Next you'll tell me there is a meaningful difference when you use a hard R.
Yeah, I have read it. He does to the headlines what the journalist class does to the headlines whenever attacking straight white males. Gamergate was always the side that was saying if you don't like it, have a thick skin, stop using relational aggression via moderation, and move the fuck on. Instead, we're moderating to protect precious feelings. I am more annoyed by imp haters than imp.
Having a history of that isn't what is objectionable, nor is having blindspots. It's that imp is weaksauce and moderating that crap just comes off as thin-skinned like the lefties and being on reddit. I thought we were here because we don't need mommy moderator. I've run into 14 year olds who're more offensive and bigger credible threats.
Anyway.
Dude. It's clear as day. There's a ton of "don't name the jew" stormf*g wink and nods in many front page topics. Or comments about last names, noses and Hypens. I mean, we all know what the fuck that means. Is it just not bannable as long as you don't say jew or jewish? Because that is what it looks like to me. Go look at the witcher casting director topic. There's a whole comment chain dancing around accusing her of being jewish and part of some jewish conspiracy. (I don't think that, myself. I'm just pointing out, it's there, and I don't see a chain of bans and deleted comments.)
That's extremely indirect compared to what Imp posts on a regular basis. People "name the woman" all day without getting banned either.
You just agree with him so you are defending him (or perhaps more likely, have common enemies). You aren't some crusader for free speech. If you were, you wouldn't have defended Rumble censorship. You aren't fooling me with your bullshit. Try crusading against R16 instead of sucking off a mentally ill retard next time. I get the feeling someone who leads with REEEEing about Holobunga deniers isn't going to attack R16 with much zeal though. Maybe the desire to save face will carry you.
And there we have it. You're the anti here so everyone else must be a fan of his. News flash. Gamergate happened because of feminism and feminism is built upon pandering to western women. How that association ever broke down for you is amazing to me. Free speech itself is in endangered most by western cultured women. This is the statistical reality when that group is the one that most often responds on surveys that hatespeech should be illegal and offending people should be criminal.
You go from "WHeRe?! ThAT DoESn'T HAppEN!!11" to "Oh yeah, that's okay, because they're coy about it."
Get fucking real. Everything is just a 1-step-removed deflection or delaying tactics where you play dumb and shuffle the goal post. Like, I've literally had an argument on KIA2 in the last 2 weeks about the holocaust being real with someone who was insistent it was all fake. Insisting it was nothing more than internment work camps. For fuck sake. It runs rampant. But holy god don't anyone dare point out that our culture is treating western women better than western men. Even with the suicide statistics, homelessness statistics and family court statistics there to back it up. Or literally gendered views on things like rape requiring a dick to commit. Or the sentencing gap on pedophilia. God forbid. That makes me an imp dick rider!
TheImp has nothing to do with OG GamerGate. He is a new fag. The feminists at the heart of GamerGate like Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian are overwhelmingly pro-trans. Some of them even are trans like Wu and Nick Nyberg. The idea that a tranny-lover who sounds just like them whining about "TERFs" all day, is somehow "carrying on the legacy of GamerGate" is beyond farcical.
Do you mean the "Western cultured" women in charge of the ADL? Public opinion has little to do with public policy, assuming for arguments sake that your claim is even correct.
I didn't move any goal posts. Like I said, Dom would let you say the same things about women that they are saying about Jews there, but that's not the type of comment TheImp was banned for.
You are free to talk about that stuff, and plenty of people do without getting banned. What is it with your grandstanding, histrionic bullshit? You barely even participate here.
"or perhaps more likely, have common enemies"
You really should have quit when you were less far behind.
Where did I ever say those people were anti-trans? The only thing I had to say about transsexuals is that they're a protected class and the R16 protection doesn't seem to apply to them the same way it seems to apply for women. It is easier to trip an R16 ban for talking shit about women as a class then it is to talk shit about trannies as a class.
Does that clarification help you stop lashing out or do you need to take a nap first?
Public policy is downstream from culture. Every political science persona with any scrap of correctness or notoriety has pointed this out. The stand alone complex comes before organization and indoctrination, not the inverse.
These claims are correct. Nobody in academia disputes these findings. If anything, they use the findings to further vilify straight white males for being all the isms and ists. Gleefully. Rather than refute.
You acted like it wasn't real and you can't get away with it. Then you pretty much said my examples were valid examples except for the fact that the comments are made with a wink and a nod. You condoned it because it was done in a sly way. Frankly, that's bullshit.
I don't think Dom should be banning anybody for R16 is my main contention, short of it being a risk to this site being shut down. Even that aside, no, Imp is clearly under more scrutiny simply by virtue of being himself and having a history of previous bans. I've seen plenty of his commentary. He's absolutely harmless. Like seriously, do you ever think you can put "Proud supporter of gamergate" and get hired by most of the fortune 500? Definitely not. So who are we trying to impress?
Either way, equal enforcement... clever wording and dogwhistles aside, or no enforcement. Picking winners and losers isn't a good look.
Do what I do. Argue with dumb viewpoints, or move on.
What should it matter? It's not worth my time to live here like some people. I was there for week 1 of gamergate. For the subreddit's original incarnation too. Toasted my gaming developer career trying to resist woke's take over IRL. I've bled enough, thanks.
But anyway, if you are worried about participation... maybe not try to gatekeep people based upon the activity level you think is appropriate? :)
You coached your language, congratulations, that somehow makes you immune from the obvious accusations you were making. Next you'll tell me there is a meaningful difference when you use a hard R.