I downvote because it's just a repeat of all his other threads on this topic. For Finland and Sweden to be a burden on NATO, their membership would have to create meaningful obligations for the rest of NATO. Having to come to their defense if they are ever attacked only matters if they're ever attacked, which they aren't going to be.
I downvote because it's just a repeat of all his other threads on this topic. For Finland and Sweden to be a burden on NATO, their membership would have to create meaningful obligations for the rest of NATO. Having to come to their defense if they are ever attacked only matters if they're ever attacked, which they aren't going to be.