Other than the 1488 crowd wanting to be able to say ‘no blacks allowed’ in certain businesses, I’m genuinely curious what else is in there that should make it get repealed?
I personally would like it not repealed mainly because I would be personally affected by said policy obviously, but I’m curious in the reasons outside of just that, if y’all have reasons other than that, as AFAIK, the CRA violates freedom of assembly in the view of people who have that opinion.
I think this isn't really a feasible example for a few reasons. Firstly, most of that was government-driven anyway, so I don't even view it as "private discrimination." There's one or two actually lunatics per, like, every thousand business owners who just wants to trade goods/services for money.
Secondly, even if they wanted to, implementation would be a pain. Are they going to check everyone entering the premises? Are they going to pay more employees to be on duty all the time, just to keep out customers? It's insane. Without a driving force - AKA the government - there's no way that naturally gets off the ground. And, just like with the CRA, I'm against the government exerting power to tell people how and with who they can do business.
I also think the protections about private data is completely different than overreach when it comes to bypassing freedom of assembly. But, even if it wasn't...yes, I'm still fine with businesses discriminating when it comes to who they let in.
As some of the other people have said, I don't want to give my money to people who hate me, anyway. If businesses were especially terrible at the height of mandates, I'm much less likely to frequent them now, even if they aren't actively kicking me out. I just won't go back to the places where they were dicks.
Absolutely let the fuckers discriminate. They're lunatics, and deserve to go out of business. Let me know who they are, so I can discriminate against them.