Other than the 1488 crowd wanting to be able to say ‘no blacks allowed’ in certain businesses, I’m genuinely curious what else is in there that should make it get repealed?
I personally would like it not repealed mainly because I would be personally affected by said policy obviously, but I’m curious in the reasons outside of just that, if y’all have reasons other than that, as AFAIK, the CRA violates freedom of assembly in the view of people who have that opinion.
Can you explain this a bit further? If you're making judgments based on world views and behaviors, you're not making judgments based on race, and if you're making judgments based on race, you're not making judgments based on world views and behaviors.
Even if you say: I wouldn't want to associate with blacks, because on average they are more anti-social than other groups, and it's too costly in terms of knowledge and risk to try to judge every individual as a person. Then you're not saying that you would avoid a black whom you know to be a cool person, so you're still not saying that you don't want to associate with blacks.
There is a "critical negro mass" where the chances of anti-social behavior is increased by roughly the cube of the number of blacks in proximity.
Even the "cool" black person won't stop another "bad" black person from stealing from or sucker punching you or generally acting dishonorably.
Racial solidarity is more important to the overwhelming majority of blacks than any other consideration.
There are vast diffeerences between and within ethnic groups. Which is why your 'bone' does not make much sense. Unless you think that you have more in common with a white SJW than a black conservative.
Coming to 'general conclusions' would not lead one to avoid everyone of a given group.
I also prefer my group. Sensible people.