Typically it tends to be a educational and informative. The problem is that when I just say stuff is removed, some people genuinely don't know why. Others might lie about it, but in some cases, I make mistakes of interpretation. This allows everybody to get an idea of what the problem is in a transparent manner. That way, if I fuck up, they let me know. If they fuck up, they know what was expected. If it's just intentional, then well, it's just intentional.
One of the first things I learned was that approving comments without explanation was actually the worst, because nobody knew where the line wasn't. So sometimes it caused people to think things were against the rules when they weren't, only going by what they had seen in previous removals.
lol at all the people not noticing how Dom's "censorship" intentionally informs you of what the original comment says.
Typically it tends to be a educational and informative. The problem is that when I just say stuff is removed, some people genuinely don't know why. Others might lie about it, but in some cases, I make mistakes of interpretation. This allows everybody to get an idea of what the problem is in a transparent manner. That way, if I fuck up, they let me know. If they fuck up, they know what was expected. If it's just intentional, then well, it's just intentional.
One of the first things I learned was that approving comments without explanation was actually the worst, because nobody knew where the line wasn't. So sometimes it caused people to think things were against the rules when they weren't, only going by what they had seen in previous removals.
It makes for hands down the funniest moderation I've ever seen, though, so thanks for that.
👍