On a superficial level I could agree with the sentiment that mere nudity is not porn, as said on that dude's sign. But give the sign a rainbow backdrop and put it in the hands of a dude marching naked in a pride parade and it becomes very clear the dude just wants to expose himself to children.
On a superficial level I could agree with the sentiment that mere nudity is not porn, as said on that dude's sign. But give the sign a rainbow backdrop and put it in the hands of a dude marching naked in a pride parade and it becomes very clear the dude just wants to expose himself to children.
Sure, I agree, but that isn't really what I was talking about in my post, which had to do with whether mere nudity is pornography.