“[The assenting judges] went so far as to say that the race-based admission system uses race as a negative and operates it as a stereotype,” the letter stated. “They may couch their opinion in legal jargon, but we all know what this opinion aims to do: advocate for a ‘colorblind’ admission process.”
LEGAL JARGON! Holy shit.
“However, as many of our students know and Justice Sotomayor says in her dissent, ‘ignoring race will not equalize a society that is racially unequal,'” the letter proclaimed.
Law schools are now telling students to ignore the law because of an 'unequal society' which most of them abused to get into law school...
“As a reminder, BU also offers a number of wellness resources that are willing and able to help students navigate these times.”
I guess they are scared some of the law students will get red pilled and need to ensure they stay 'on track'.
But not even, in this case: the majority “couched” its reasoning in a clear statement of the law. “Jargon” to me suggests obfuscation or highly technical language. I can say that the dissent of KBJ did one of those two things though. But not through legal jargon, just through whiny leftist horseshit.
LEGAL JARGON! Holy shit.
Law schools are now telling students to ignore the law because of an 'unequal society' which most of them abused to get into law school...
I guess they are scared some of the law students will get red pilled and need to ensure they stay 'on track'.
Yeah they tend to do that.
But not even, in this case: the majority “couched” its reasoning in a clear statement of the law. “Jargon” to me suggests obfuscation or highly technical language. I can say that the dissent of KBJ did one of those two things though. But not through legal jargon, just through whiny leftist horseshit.
I think they just said what they said without reading the actual thing. It was like a lnee jerk reaction that things should be that way.