But not even, in this case: the majority “couched” its reasoning in a clear statement of the law. “Jargon” to me suggests obfuscation or highly technical language. I can say that the dissent of KBJ did one of those two things though. But not through legal jargon, just through whiny leftist horseshit.
But not even, in this case: the majority “couched” its reasoning in a clear statement of the law. “Jargon” to me suggests obfuscation or highly technical language. I can say that the dissent of KBJ did one of those two things though. But not through legal jargon, just through whiny leftist horseshit.
I think they just said what they said without reading the actual thing. It was like a lnee jerk reaction that things should be that way.