I don't live in an urban area. You want a woman who is a 28 year old virgin? Again: she's gonna be a morman. I don't even think most devout Catholic women can make that claim. The woman who only had one sexual partner at the age of 28, got married when she was 23. Her only partner is her husband. If she's 28 and a virgin, she's got serious emotional and psychological problems that would exclude her from your courtship.
Virginity is an asset for prospective partners, not a liability
Diminishing returns.
A 40 year old virgin for either men or women does not indicate a well developed person. It's an indicator of larger issues that stunted their development. In an optimal world, they would already have been married and have been talking to their kids about getting grandkids.
A 20 year old virgin does not have this problem.
That is why you don't just set it as a categorical imperative. Virginity has utility, but not forever, and may indicate something besides stoicism against temptation.
You're acting like virginity is a bigger problem than being a whore which is patently absurd.
No, I'm not. I'm saying the idea of not marrying anyone who isn't a virgin isn't practical. You're building out the rest as a strawman.
There's a reason that there are infinite derogatory terms for women involving sex, but none that involve abstaining from sex.
Yeah it's a bad sign, but you live in the West. You have limited options.
I don't live in an urban area. You want a woman who is a 28 year old virgin? Again: she's gonna be a morman. I don't even think most devout Catholic women can make that claim. The woman who only had one sexual partner at the age of 28, got married when she was 23. Her only partner is her husband. If she's 28 and a virgin, she's got serious emotional and psychological problems that would exclude her from your courtship.
Diminishing returns.
A 40 year old virgin for either men or women does not indicate a well developed person. It's an indicator of larger issues that stunted their development. In an optimal world, they would already have been married and have been talking to their kids about getting grandkids.
A 20 year old virgin does not have this problem.
That is why you don't just set it as a categorical imperative. Virginity has utility, but not forever, and may indicate something besides stoicism against temptation.
No, I'm not. I'm saying the idea of not marrying anyone who isn't a virgin isn't practical. You're building out the rest as a strawman.
Femcel.