Ah so it's race wide but not gender wide, because attacking half of humanity for your sexual frustration is a-ok, but discussing the actual humans that actually own x, y, z, well less than 2% the population, is blaming an entire race for a racewide conspilpul pilpul pilpul pilpul and therefore banned
Oh AND you're an evil stormcuck! Yes, from our "name blame and hate literally half of humanity" moral high chair, we look down our noses at you dirty "angry at the actual actions of the actual owner" scum and your dirty >2%-blamer ways! These "you can just literally look up their names lmao" stormcucks have no moral or intellectual standing!
Interestingly enough, the effect is apparent in plain sight here. A user who represents less than 2% of this forum considers himself the owner, maintains a system of entirely personal ethnicity driven preference, and would rather you blame something like 50%of the users for discussing plain reality.
Also, this one guy (I think it's just him, here?) is gonna become more odious as his tribe loses the war on the internet proper, eventually bringing you to Great Awakening levels of cringe and policing in order to maintain the political narratives they selectively manufacture, unless it is all forcibly eschewed by some populist mechanism.
oh uh, all the above an individual basis, tho, of course, in accordance to the rule
Replying separately instead of editing to add that I' shaking my fucking head at the mod of a gamergate forum who would rather ban users for badmouthing women than let le heckin hatred spread.
How long did the forum collectively spend bitching about the nonexistence of hate speech, coping with gamergaters being treated as a hate group, and about how the mods at reddit were selectively deleting posts and enforcing rules?
Are you smelling what I'm cooking, here? Seriously. It is all just so transparent and clear and cyclical.
Yknow people change over time and sometimes they discover they feel differently about stuff than they thought they did. Sometimes they find that suddenly they no longer fuckin belong! It is sad and yet majestic, it's life and growth and in my opinion it could fill the body of "goodbye cruel forum" letter that would leave free human expression enjouers everywhere teary eyed.
This is not hate speech. I have never accused anyone of hate speech. I already replied to you about Conquest's Second Law elsewhere.
No one in GamerGate ever argued that "Women in gaming was a strategy imposed by women to eradicate men's spaces, as part of their sexual war on men, and their innate inferiority as a sub-species." If you remember correctly, we had a "#NotYourShield" campaign to explicitly reject the oppositional-dialectic that the SJWs were using to defend themselves.
You're trying to argue that GamerGate was about needing to express how much we hate women, when it was a consumer revolt against corruption, fraud, and nepotism.
Ah so it's race wide but not gender wide, because attacking half of humanity for your sexual frustration is a-ok, but discussing the actual humans that actually own x, y, z, well less than 2% the population, is blaming an entire race for a racewide conspilpul pilpul pilpul pilpul and therefore banned
Oh AND you're an evil stormcuck! Yes, from our "name blame and hate literally half of humanity" moral high chair, we look down our noses at you dirty "angry at the actual actions of the actual owner" scum and your dirty >2%-blamer ways! These "you can just literally look up their names lmao" stormcucks have no moral or intellectual standing!
Interestingly enough, the effect is apparent in plain sight here. A user who represents less than 2% of this forum considers himself the owner, maintains a system of entirely personal ethnicity driven preference, and would rather you blame something like 50%of the users for discussing plain reality.
Also, this one guy (I think it's just him, here?) is gonna become more odious as his tribe loses the war on the internet proper, eventually bringing you to Great Awakening levels of cringe and policing in order to maintain the political narratives they selectively manufacture, unless it is all forcibly eschewed by some populist mechanism.
oh uh, all the above an individual basis, tho, of course, in accordance to the rule
Let's ask Impy about that. Oh wait, he's been banned for 24 days for this exact fucking reason.
Replying separately instead of editing to add that I' shaking my fucking head at the mod of a gamergate forum who would rather ban users for badmouthing women than let le heckin hatred spread.
How long did the forum collectively spend bitching about the nonexistence of hate speech, coping with gamergaters being treated as a hate group, and about how the mods at reddit were selectively deleting posts and enforcing rules?
Are you smelling what I'm cooking, here? Seriously. It is all just so transparent and clear and cyclical.
Yknow people change over time and sometimes they discover they feel differently about stuff than they thought they did. Sometimes they find that suddenly they no longer fuckin belong! It is sad and yet majestic, it's life and growth and in my opinion it could fill the body of "goodbye cruel forum" letter that would leave free human expression enjouers everywhere teary eyed.
This is not hate speech. I have never accused anyone of hate speech. I already replied to you about Conquest's Second Law elsewhere.
No one in GamerGate ever argued that "Women in gaming was a strategy imposed by women to eradicate men's spaces, as part of their sexual war on men, and their innate inferiority as a sub-species." If you remember correctly, we had a "#NotYourShield" campaign to explicitly reject the oppositional-dialectic that the SJWs were using to defend themselves.
You're trying to argue that GamerGate was about needing to express how much we hate women, when it was a consumer revolt against corruption, fraud, and nepotism.