I don't care about Carson Wentz. At all. I don't even know who he is beyond what the article explains.
Regardless, hunting isn't a moral failure. Trying to use it as a justification to paint someone as immoral is a failure, however. The author of that tweat and the author of that article are both giant failures.
There are good and bad ways to hunt, and arguments to be made as to when you should or shouldn't do so, but there's no moral axiom that hunting is bad in and of itself, and that doing so makes you bad by extension. If there was, humanity would have never made it past the hunter gather stage.
humanity would have never made it past the hunter gather stage.
Obviously the pinacle of human achievement would have been to ''evolve'' from hunter-gatherers into gatherers-gatherers in mud huts and not even bother with the wheel.
I don't care about Carson Wentz. At all. I don't even know who he is beyond what the article explains.
Regardless, hunting isn't a moral failure. Trying to use it as a justification to paint someone as immoral is a failure, however. The author of that tweat and the author of that article are both giant failures.
There are good and bad ways to hunt, and arguments to be made as to when you should or shouldn't do so, but there's no moral axiom that hunting is bad in and of itself, and that doing so makes you bad by extension. If there was, humanity would have never made it past the hunter gather stage.
Obviously the pinacle of human achievement would have been to ''evolve'' from hunter-gatherers into gatherers-gatherers in mud huts and not even bother with the wheel.