The replication crisis started in the social "sciences". Key word being "started" because it has since spread at a rather rapid pace across all of science.
For those not in the know, this means that a LOT of science simply cannot be reproduced with their given methodology, making it at best suspect and at worst outright lies. If an experiment or study cannot be replicated to achieve at the very least similar findings (let alone the same findings), it is by definition not accurate and therefore faulty.
Research and by extension life that relies upon the findings of research will become very difficult when it takes faulty science to be true, and what's worse is that far too many will be too stupid to figure out what the issue is and how to rectify it.
The replication crisis started in the social "sciences". Key word being "started" because it has since spread at a rather rapid pace across all of science.
For those not in the know, this means that a LOT of science simply cannot be reproduced with their given methodology, making it at best suspect and at worst outright lies. If an experiment or study cannot be replicated to achieve at the very least similar findings (let alone the same findings), it is by definition not accurate and therefore faulty.
Research and by extension life that relies upon the findings of research will become very difficult when it takes faulty science to be true, and what's worse is that far too many will be too stupid to figure out what the issue is and how to rectify it.