The only flaw I've seen with that approach is that Leftists are so dishonest that sometimes you need to intentionally interrupt their mistake because it's bait to make you derail your own argument. I'll give you my Reddit conversation I had with a Leftist over Juneteenth here
"UniqueUsername" here must have tried every fucking deflection in the book to get away from my single, repetitive, falsifiable, demand: Give me a picture of this very well known holiday that's been continuously celebrated across the US for 157 years. Which he even had to go so far as to do the "Educate yourself" excuse because he knew that he can't.
Many of the deflections look like intentional mistakes. Unforced errors. But in military tactics (which is all talking with a Leftist ever is: rhetorical warfare against a sophist) these serve as nothing more than a feigned retreat to get you to attack a different direction, because the position you are on is actually effective, and their deflections aren't working. If you want your enemy to attack in a specific direction, then you have to present him with an opportunity.
Instead of giving me photos from Juneteenth, now we're arguing about Emancipation Day, or we're arguing about Saturnalium versus Christmas, or we're arguing about Father's Day, or we're arguing about how a holiday originates, or we're arguing about Easter, or we're arguing about whether or not there can be photographs from the 1800. These aren't honest mistakes, they're not even dishonest mistakes. They are feigns to derail the conversation onto a different topic. They can't win the battle the ground they are on, so they start at different battle somewhere else. I admit to falling for this too many times because sometimes people say really stupid shit that baits too hard.
At a certain point, you really need to corner them, and just pound the hell out of their position so that no one will take it back up. That guarantees that the other positions they tried to distract you with aren't going to be addressed; but you purpose is to do so much permanent damage to this position, that they can't take it back up for a while; and that no "Useful Idiot" watching will take it at all. Rhetorical scorched Earth. Don't worry about those other positions, you'll have a fight tomorrow on them if they need to be taken.
I’d say it’s more that we’ve let a grim caricature of female nature take over in an effort to not be mean, and we need a return to masculinity as far as leadership and values go. Right now we’re being run by hysterical female values to appeal to hysterical female women because they’re one of the biggest voting demos you can swing.
I think Connor Tomlinson best described it as the "Pathological Devouring Mother Dragon of Chaos" or something like that. The feminine chaotic evil that murders civilization and tears order to pieces. That's definitely at play here.
The only flaw I've seen with that approach is that Leftists are so dishonest that sometimes you need to intentionally interrupt their mistake because it's bait to make you derail your own argument. I'll give you my Reddit conversation I had with a Leftist over Juneteenth here
"UniqueUsername" here must have tried every fucking deflection in the book to get away from my single, repetitive, falsifiable, demand: Give me a picture of this very well known holiday that's been continuously celebrated across the US for 157 years. Which he even had to go so far as to do the "Educate yourself" excuse because he knew that he can't.
Many of the deflections look like intentional mistakes. Unforced errors. But in military tactics (which is all talking with a Leftist ever is: rhetorical warfare against a sophist) these serve as nothing more than a feigned retreat to get you to attack a different direction, because the position you are on is actually effective, and their deflections aren't working. If you want your enemy to attack in a specific direction, then you have to present him with an opportunity.
Instead of giving me photos from Juneteenth, now we're arguing about Emancipation Day, or we're arguing about Saturnalium versus Christmas, or we're arguing about Father's Day, or we're arguing about how a holiday originates, or we're arguing about Easter, or we're arguing about whether or not there can be photographs from the 1800. These aren't honest mistakes, they're not even dishonest mistakes. They are feigns to derail the conversation onto a different topic. They can't win the battle the ground they are on, so they start at different battle somewhere else. I admit to falling for this too many times because sometimes people say really stupid shit that baits too hard.
At a certain point, you really need to corner them, and just pound the hell out of their position so that no one will take it back up. That guarantees that the other positions they tried to distract you with aren't going to be addressed; but you purpose is to do so much permanent damage to this position, that they can't take it back up for a while; and that no "Useful Idiot" watching will take it at all. Rhetorical scorched Earth. Don't worry about those other positions, you'll have a fight tomorrow on them if they need to be taken.
It's amazing how often leftist tactics mirror those of women, lol.
Our particular system of authoritarianism cultivates feminine power pathologies because it's geared toward recruiting women as a power block.
I’d say it’s more that we’ve let a grim caricature of female nature take over in an effort to not be mean, and we need a return to masculinity as far as leadership and values go. Right now we’re being run by hysterical female values to appeal to hysterical female women because they’re one of the biggest voting demos you can swing.
I think Connor Tomlinson best described it as the "Pathological Devouring Mother Dragon of Chaos" or something like that. The feminine chaotic evil that murders civilization and tears order to pieces. That's definitely at play here.