If you believe their assertion that their lesbian-ness or whatever alphabet they claim is an innate immutable trait you receive at birth, then the odds would be extremely low.
If you believe the truth, they were groomed into it.
Still, if you tell alphabet people that truth they will likely counter with something like the left handed argument. It goes like this: "The true rates of alphabet-ness are MUCH higher than the historical norms and now that society is finally accepting people for who they TRULY are it's natural that you'll see MUCH more LGBTQ identity, just as once left handedness was acceptable the rate of left handed people skyrocketed."
I'd probably counter that with something like a natural selection argument; that is, gay people are a genetic dead end and if any species naturally developed a large percentage of homosexuality they would cease to exist. Similarly for human nations or cultures.
If you've got any other good counter arguments I'd love to hear them.
If you believe their assertion that their lesbian-ness or whatever alphabet they claim is an innate immutable trait you receive at birth, then the odds would be extremely low.
If you believe the truth, they were groomed into it.
Oh, they were most certainly groomed into it.
Still, if you tell alphabet people that truth they will likely counter with something like the left handed argument. It goes like this: "The true rates of alphabet-ness are MUCH higher than the historical norms and now that society is finally accepting people for who they TRULY are it's natural that you'll see MUCH more LGBTQ identity, just as once left handedness was acceptable the rate of left handed people skyrocketed."
I'd probably counter that with something like a natural selection argument; that is, gay people are a genetic dead end and if any species naturally developed a large percentage of homosexuality they would cease to exist. Similarly for human nations or cultures.
If you've got any other good counter arguments I'd love to hear them.