Dr Peterson, counsel says, admitted his problem with tone in a response.
Schabas: where does he say that
Backhouse pulls line. Counsel reads it: I have surrounded myself with people to make me conscious of tone
Schabas: that isnt an acknowledgment of a problem
Counsel: Peterson suggested something similar to what the ICRC recommended. That he'd have a social media team to help him monitor for tone.
Counsel: Peterson says he has already done something "akin" to what ICRC has asked for.
Counsel: this letter demonstrates that Peterson recognizes a problem with how he is communicating, not about the subject matter. And that remediation is required. The only dispute is whether the remediation must be consistent with the college standards.
Bunch of self-important assholes extort money from you for the privilege of attaching your name to their brand, while regularly and passive-aggressively threatening you with all sorts of penalties and legal action if you fail to comply with their ever increasing woke nonsense (ESG, Climate reporting etc).
That wraps everything up for the day! I'll be summarizing the proceeding in a youtube video tonight, you can watch here https://www.youtube.com/@theCCF
These comments are not political and social debate, it is transphobic. They attack the dignity and worth of trans people
But transphobia is never a part of debate when a professional is using his or her title.
Addresses a question Schabas brought up as a devils advocate. If Peterson had said page is confused, would that be acceptable tone. Intervener says this is dehumanizing and pathologizing trans people
That "dead naming" is not appropriate for a regulated health professional and denies their identity
DOCUMENTED PROOF IN A COURT OF LAW ON WHY YOU NEVER APOLOGIZE: https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671601903585615882
Dr Peterson, counsel says, admitted his problem with tone in a response. Schabas: where does he say that
Backhouse pulls line. Counsel reads it: I have surrounded myself with people to make me conscious of tone Schabas: that isnt an acknowledgment of a problem
Counsel: Peterson suggested something similar to what the ICRC recommended. That he'd have a social media team to help him monitor for tone.
Counsel: Peterson says he has already done something "akin" to what ICRC has asked for.
Counsel: this letter demonstrates that Peterson recognizes a problem with how he is communicating, not about the subject matter. And that remediation is required. The only dispute is whether the remediation must be consistent with the college standards.
https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671527922341953537
This is deep, point by point tweeting. It's dense and a touch hard to parse, but captures the arguments being put forth pretty well.
Never get a job that has a professional association that controls your job
Accountant here, can confirm.
Bunch of self-important assholes extort money from you for the privilege of attaching your name to their brand, while regularly and passive-aggressively threatening you with all sorts of penalties and legal action if you fail to comply with their ever increasing woke nonsense (ESG, Climate reporting etc).
It’s a shit show.
Threadroll of pre-lunch: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1671500219043794944.html
Back from the break: https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671582747100413952
https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671617923209650177
Threadroll wants me to sign in so someone else will have to unroll this: https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671582747100413952
https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671613097226784770
10 yrs ago, EGALE would be speaking in defense of JBP, now they want Fox News banned from the airwaves
https://twitter.com/cvangeyn/status/1671613808081502209
These comments are not political and social debate, it is transphobic. They attack the dignity and worth of trans people
But transphobia is never a part of debate when a professional is using his or her title.
Addresses a question Schabas brought up as a devils advocate. If Peterson had said page is confused, would that be acceptable tone. Intervener says this is dehumanizing and pathologizing trans people
That "dead naming" is not appropriate for a regulated health professional and denies their identity