This sounds like an idealist position that doesn't track with history.

Sure, it's a philosophically Liberal position.

Yes, the traditional method is the government creating an affirmative vision by democide, crushing dissent, and creating unchallengeable institutions of power that have the right to kill and impoverish your family at all times, for any reasons.

As such, I admit that I'm not being objective enough to the level of argument your making. Yes, as with Italian Elite Theory, you can crush dissent and freedom enough to compel a population to be a race of slaves in your imperial fashion. That's been done many times, and many imperial citizens are very fond of their empire, their place in it, and murdering their specified opponents. I do not reject that illiberal empires and tyrannies can, and will, do this.

Great. Now, I live in the United States, a country founded as a Revolutionary Liberal Republic, whereby individual liberty is to be respected at the cost of the government; and that passed on Anglo Protestantism, our moral framework denies our institutions the authority of God; and which mandates the responsibility of moral conduct on the individual alone.

As such, I want to preserve those structures (or at least build something to replace the ones that have been destroyed) so that I don't need to live in an illiberal imperial hell hole.

The larger problem in America is we have an empire (the federal government) imposing a set of cultural standards on every state, overturning laws on behavior that the people wanted. It's probably too late to go back to that standard because the poison has set in across the western world.

Sure, the Empire of Columbia must fall. That's precisely what I'm asking for. I'm not interested in seizing the empire to enact my will. We had a republic before, I'd like to go back to that.

As for the poison, I strongly disagree. If anything, the rise of European Liberalism is effectively a fluke of history that would not have ordinarily risen were it not for multiple geographic and political coincidences. Frankly, I see an era of less collectivism and authoritarianism than we have seen in the 20th century (which is probably the worst collectivism and totalitarianism has ever been). Totalitarianism, even in eras before Liberalism, was very rare. Even in full autocracies, you would not expect totalitarianism. You'd need something akin to the Egyptian Pharos or Assyrian Empire (the Cult of Ishtar) to get to anything similar to what we had in Cambodia, Germany, or the Soviet Union.

It's a long argument that I won't draw out here, but suffice it to say: the industrial age and the rise of Leftism created a perfect storm of human commodification and political rationalism that have ravaged the Earth for 200 years, and it is now coming to an end. Our elites are hoping that the digital age will be the final epoch that turns us all into a borg collective to serve the vision of the anointed, but it has actually allowed for the individuation of firepower and economics which has literally never been seen in human history. As such, the individuation of politics will likely succeed over the coming century, displacing the old Fabian Socialist order that is currently dying.