trannies taking the whole LGBT down with them
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
Odd that independents are trending slightly up, while both rep and dem are trending sharply down
Consenting homosexual relationships are neither moral nor immoral to me. They may be inferior in long-term societal value than the optimal heterosexual relationship, but they are simply a non-issue. A gay couple that is monogamous to each other in a long-term, successful, relationship is morally better than a heterosexual broken home where we see drug abuse, physical violence, and child neglect. Two gays involved in themselves is fine. Two straights who have a miserable relationship and cause their children to grow up and be part of the "I wish I was aborted crowd" is far worse. This is because the behaviors are far worse in one than another. The classification of the relationship is irrelevant.
A Queer is a Sex Communist. As such, all of their behavior is designed to be explicitly and implicitly anti-moral in all cases. Their ideological totalism guarantees that all of their behavior is in service to their anti-moral ideology. As such, every Queer is anti-moral.
It's obvious that the Alphabet Soup lobby is a neo-Marxist political bloc ("Sex Communists") being exploited by the establishment, and anyone with any sense who isn't an activist understands that consensual sexual relations should remain private and that pederasty is a crime.
Legal same-sex marriage is the only reasonable political concession, but give 'em an inch and they think they're rulers.
Edit: every once in a while I need to remind myself that the entire political movement centers around who or what one does or does not like to fuck. Neo-Marxist identitarianism burrowing into every aspect of our public life obscures this plain fact.
Legal same-sex marriage is a reasonable political concession, but I'm actually more along the lines of "keep government out of marriage" altogether.
I'm not saying don't allow private businesses to pair bond, but I just don't think that the conservatives really thought through the idea of having the government play this game of subsidizing and regulating families and relationships. Clearly, the government isn't to be trusted with any of it.
I'm unfamiliar with the sorts of advantages legal marriage provides; if they're all state incentives, I'd agree.