that he shouldn’t be executed on the basis that he was insane
I'll never understand that argument. The death-penalty is reserved for people that are beyond redemption. How does being insane change anything? It actually should be an argument for the death penalty, no?
I'll never understand that argument. The death-penalty is reserved for people that are beyond redemption. How does being insane change anything? It actually should be an argument for the death penalty, no?