You argue like a feminist. And including protecting kids in women's pushes to harm men is their other famous tactic.
or is "frightened or astonished". Another scenario appears to describe an abuse of power, where the victim is "worried" of the consequences of refusal.
All she has to say is "he was bigger than me, I felt nervous, he might have hurt me so I didn't say anything, I just did what he asked." and some poor guy is fucked.
I'm not, I'm probably more pessimistic than you. But I'm not disconnected from reality.
Any criminal punishment has to have intent on the part of the offender. If the woman is afraid and the guy knows it or should reasonable know, that is one thing. If not, no punishment can result from that.
You argue like a feminist. And including protecting kids in women's pushes to harm men is their other famous tactic.
What of it? That still requires mens rea.
You're too optimistic.
All she has to say is "he was bigger than me, I felt nervous, he might have hurt me so I didn't say anything, I just did what he asked." and some poor guy is fucked.
I'm not, I'm probably more pessimistic than you. But I'm not disconnected from reality.
Any criminal punishment has to have intent on the part of the offender. If the woman is afraid and the guy knows it or should reasonable know, that is one thing. If not, no punishment can result from that.
Yeah, no. There are countries with "yes means yes" rape law where the woman doesn't even have to prove you have even met.
The only thing that protects justice is keeping women's meddling out of the system.