From a corpo point of view a game which has no end of life built into it is a product you have to compete with forever.
The only ESG i can see but it is a bit farfetched is that a central of the communication ensures that wrong-think can be destroyed at will with the everchanging rules. But I do not remember that being a explicit point of their point system.
Question:
Do you guys think that turning their games into spyware raises the company's ESG score?
I don't ever remember anyone actually saying "Yes, take away my ability to play and save the game anytime I want," yet this is apparently normal.
I love how one of those clowns on GTPlanet said that it's okay because e-mail and cell phones exist.
Yeah, they're totally the same thing as a video game designed to primarily to entertain.
Do these people think evangelizing greedy developers like this gets them VIP access or something? Microsoft likely doesn't even know they exist.
From a corpo point of view a game which has no end of life built into it is a product you have to compete with forever.
The only ESG i can see but it is a bit farfetched is that a central of the communication ensures that wrong-think can be destroyed at will with the everchanging rules. But I do not remember that being a explicit point of their point system.
That's a good point. Nintendo both uses Mario and competes against Mario with every game. Most companies don't want to do that.