I'm not saying that at all. I "defend women" in the sense of refuting the Imp's deranged attacks when they are incorrect (which they always are). But the Stormfags generally do it because they think he blames things on women when they should be blamed on the Jews.
If you faced
them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring
them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm
grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime
which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a
moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your
argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought
that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on
the following day. Antonio would be utterly oblivious to what had
happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his
former absurdities, as if nothing had happened.
Lmfao
>im an impartial and ideologically-balanced intellectual
>the only reason people defend women is to attack jews!
I'm not saying that at all. I "defend women" in the sense of refuting the Imp's deranged attacks when they are incorrect (which they always are). But the Stormfags generally do it because they think he blames things on women when they should be blamed on the Jews.
You mean like in the OP image? Just one of dozens of examples from the last week where he attributes to “women” the action of “jew(s)”?
Does noticing that make me a “stormfag”? an accusation you and your ilk (low iq “moderates”) love to spew but hate to back up
Ah yes, 'noticing'. You notice it when a Jew does something you don't like, never when he does something you do like.