I heard President Trump finally gave in on this issue (depressing), but even his speech on it didn't give actual reasons.
"They'll be outcompeted" isn't an argument when the very institution you're worried about provides no value to society, sucking up cash to produce famous lesbians who hate men. The world definitely needs more of those, said nobody ever.
In my opinion, the argument is framed entirely wrongly. It shouldn't be "save women or you side with trannies", it should be "Repeal Title IX and kill women's sports off for good."
Unless they are volleyball, gymnastics, pole vault and maybe tennis no. Curling definitely a pass as look at those sweeping skills /s
The issue is that they don't perform as well as men in terms of physical performance or attracting an audience, most of their ratings are artificial pushing by media. Combine that with the leftist propaganda they usually spread and it's like they welcome the death by troons that is happening.
NCAA WBB is fine. The tournament pulls better viewership numbers than the NIT does.
At a lot of universities, WBB admission is free for students as a way to fill seats, which works pretty well.
Anyone know what he said? Too many acronyms.
Jokes aside, free admission shouldn't count as viewers.
They count when they spend on concessions. At the universities that are really into basketball (anything in North Carolina, UCLA, most of the Big 10, etc) the women's programs bring in decent money.