My answer is obvious, but I'll leave it here to start with.
We need to reduce the representation of women in education massively. The majority of women seeking these roles have malicious intent, and are actively harming young boys.
We know they don't mark boys fairly, but that's just the peak of the insidious feminist plot.
They've clearly been destroying the self-worth of boys in the schools to groom a new generation of woman worshipping simps.
I can't even blame this on women, their malice is obvious when looking at other metrics but the system itself is flawed beyond belief to produce these results.
I hate the idea that public sector workers are just rewarded for trying. It should be more ruthless, like the corporate world. If you don't achieve your targets, you're out.
Of course, this kind of environment will have to have higher pay to be viable and that's probably why these jobs are so comfortable. It compensates for the private sector's higher pay.
It is so, so, SO much worse than that. I've said this before on here I think, but I'm a community (junior) college computer science/IT professor. Probably about half my colleagues don't bother giving final exams in their classes. Many of them have a noticeable (10% or even more in some cases) portion of the student's grade in college level coursework (yes, anyone who wants to feel free to make jokes about community colleges being a continuation of high school, I've heard them all, but it's supposed to be college coursework) be "did you show up to class?". Because, when you fail Jimmy there's a chance Jimmy or Jimmy's parents start whining, and that gets escalated to the administration - and THAT gets into how most public sector employees function.
You do not try, unless absolutely necessary. Not only does trying potentially require effort on your part, but if you try you might have to get your boss involved, and if your boss has to get involved and maybe actually do some actual work then you might get in trouble. No, the goal of most public sector employees is "shut up the person on the other end of the desk/phone/etc. so they don't get the boss involved." And in an educational setting, that is just floating students through regardless of how little they actually know, because the lazy incompetent with a C who did nothing all semester will almost certainly be glad to take it and leave, whereas some of them may complain if they get a F. (Fortunately my department chair agrees with me on trying to have some rigor so he is willing to have my back in those cases, but I know at least 2 cases - one of mine and one from another professor in my department - did get escalated past him to the administration this past semester).
(and that holds for probably all public sector stuff, not just education. If you have time, listen to this playlist of a guy [Louis Rossmann, a few of his videos have shown up here before] spending literal days trying to figure out how a lien got placed on his business by New York City, and how to resolve it only to get bounced from department to department to department because no one in the bureaucracy even understands their own systems).
That's one way to put it, even then it is worse than anyone outside the system can imagine. At the high school level (and lower) in the US, it is even worse. Thanks primarily to No Child Left Behind (from George W Bush) and also other US Department of Education policies, it is nearly (if not literally) impossible to fail someone in high school. And that is not an exaggeration. You are forbidden from giving someone below a 50% (or is it 60%, not sure) as their grade in the first quarter of the school year even if the student does absolutely no work and gets a 0 on every exam - because a lower score is too difficult for them to make up. If a student does no work all year, and comes to you with 2 weeks left and says "I want to make up all the work I did not do" you are obligated to give them make up assignments, and give them credit for those makeups. And in the unlikely event that someone does fail a class, the district gives them some remedial stuff to do over the summer and then they're considered good to go for the next year. The US educational system is literally training people that they don't need to do anything they don't want to do, then they can just whine if things will end badly and their whining will be catered to.