There is no question that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. But there is a difference between material that is ‘obscene’ in the vernacular, and material that is ‘obscene’ under the law
vs
“This win represents a triumph over hate,”
I'd like to point out those two things are very different. The judge said you might get away on a technicality with exposing minors to obscenity. The government might not have a right to regulate your borderline performance. They apparently think they're spreading love.
From different article (but on this topic):
vs
I'd like to point out those two things are very different. The judge said you might get away on a technicality with exposing minors to obscenity. The government might not have a right to regulate your borderline performance. They apparently think they're spreading love.