Archive Link to the quoted article
DeSantis cannot win the nomination on issues of economic policy. It is the economic policy that impacts the Billionaire Wall Street donors and multinationals. The donors are paying for an economic control outcome. That is why we are seeing such an emphasis on cultural issues from the Sea Island strategy, as displayed in the policy emphasis of Ron DeSantis.
cough "Protecting women" cough
Elon > World Economic Forum (Yaccarino) > Tulsi Gabbard > DeSimptis > Babylon Bee > Libs of TikTok > "defend women" agenda < Matt Walsh < Daily Wire
Citadel Securities (Ken Griffin) is likely who is pushing Target and Anheuser-Busch shares down, he is a major backer of DeSimptis and opens huge short positions frequently.
I think I worked it out.
The DeSimptis campaign was first being built when WEF member Tulsi Gabbard pushed "save women's sports" for the first time.
DeSimptis quickly made this his entire post-pandemic platform.
Elon bought Twitter to promote DeSimptis - that's why Trump never moved from Truth Social.
The reason there wasn't much legal scrutiny and a lot of media hitpieces was to serve the agenda of making him look targeted, like President Trump is.
From there, Elon opened the floodgates for the TERFs to come in and prop up the DeSimp agenda.
The timeline gets a little fuzzy here because I can't remember when this happened, but remember when Libs of TikTok got doxxed? Who took her under their wing? The Babylon Bee, now a paid-up DeSimptis ally.
The Daily Wire was always NeverTrump, yet they're all eating up Matt Walsh's clear push to make DeSimptis look like the man for the job. Has he committed to supporting President Trump over the establishment?
Getting back to the WEF, and the TERFs, Linda Yaccarino links those two groups to Elon, giving a direct line of communication between the WEF, Elon and TERF ideology when she becomes the new CEO of Twitter. Yaccarino is WEF chair for the Future of Work, and board member of a feminist organization.
But how can you really "prove" that the DeSimp agenda is winning? Fake boycotts, driven by Murdoch media and backed by Ken Griffin's short interest in the targets to make it look like they're falling organically.
The agenda is obvious - to hit President Trump for being too liberal.
The schools are to blame. But it wasn't women who created public schools. Far from it.
It doesn't matter who created schools, it's who's running them.
Even if you don't believe there's something wrong with women as a whole, it's predominantly left-wing women that want to be teachers, and I'm sure that isn't because they love children.
I'd like to think we can agree that they take these roles to harm the boys and elevate the girls?
Jewesses?
Come on, there's not enough of them for that to be remotely true.
I can engage with you in good faith, but you have to at least form some common ground.
The over-representation of feminist women in education is not because of the modern explanation of "their natural instinct to support children" but actually because they can use this power over the most vulnerable to entrench the sisterhood's power, by grading boys down, teaching them to hate themselves and generally grooming them to be minimum wage simps pissing money away on OnlyFans to paper over their emotional cracks with a fake relationship, in the future.
How much do you agree with that?
Good faith huh? Answer me a simple question then please.
Is pedophilia wrong or not?