Is he going back and forth, or are you wilfully misinterpreting things that don't fully support your perspective? All I've seen is that he knows outright censoring of it was wrong, and that he warned there might be limited reach due to advertisers making sure they aren't associated with it (they have that right whether you like it or not).
A lot of people ignore that advertising and marketing is 100% pozzed. The advertiser's "rules" regarding what is advertiser friendly or sensitive content are not consistent or logical. Hate speech against straight white men and gratuitous sexual posts are ok. Calling a man in drag a man is violent hate speech. One will cause dangerous trannies to unite and stir up a fake controversy using their friends in media, which their friends in marketing use to tell their bosses to pull ads. The other does nothing because the media are fine with children consuming pornography and genocide of the White race.
Now if you think he should tell the advertisers to suck an egg and go elsewhere if they don't like freedom of speech, that's a reasonable argument. If twitter is able to run a highly profitable business that way (like Gab) then that's the honest way to go.
Is he going back and forth, or are you wilfully misinterpreting things that don't fully support your perspective? All I've seen is that he knows outright censoring of it was wrong, and that he warned there might be limited reach due to advertisers making sure they aren't associated with it (they have that right whether you like it or not).
A lot of people ignore that advertising and marketing is 100% pozzed. The advertiser's "rules" regarding what is advertiser friendly or sensitive content are not consistent or logical. Hate speech against straight white men and gratuitous sexual posts are ok. Calling a man in drag a man is violent hate speech. One will cause dangerous trannies to unite and stir up a fake controversy using their friends in media, which their friends in marketing use to tell their bosses to pull ads. The other does nothing because the media are fine with children consuming pornography and genocide of the White race.
Now if you think he should tell the advertisers to suck an egg and go elsewhere if they don't like freedom of speech, that's a reasonable argument. If twitter is able to run a highly profitable business that way (like Gab) then that's the honest way to go.