I’m one of the whites who left at the beginning of 2017, and let me tell you that this is basically semantics at this point. The practice has been in place for years now.
I’m a fully qualified Chartered accountant, board certified with articles (proof that I completed a sort of apprenticeship).
I went on 24 job interviews in the month of January 2017, not one bit. Sorry whitey, back of the queue for you 🖕
The response you get is always the asinine, “Well YOUR people did it for forty years, so fair’s fair”.
My people did it for forty years yes, but at least they knew what the fuck they were doing. They built a financial and economic powerhouse at the bottom of the poorest continent in the world. It’s all well and good that everything’s “fairer” now, but it helps no one to have no food, collapsing bridges and rolling blackouts up to 18 hours a day.
But yeah, forget about reasoning with a 🦍, especially when the entire western globohomo regime still holds them up as a shining example of success.
“Well YOUR people did it for forty years, so fair’s fair”.
And by doing it themselves, and justifying it so, they're wholly condoning the practice and negating any grievance they had about it.
If something is bad when your enemy does it to you, it's also bad when you do it to them. The only exception to that rule is matters of necessity, such as it becomes imperative to fight your opponents with their own weapons. But this? This is petty, short-sighted, and anti-civilization. There's no pragmatism, no goal. Just spite and irrationality.
That falls under the umbrella of pragmatism. If they're the aggressor and they've made it imperative to fight them, you should do whatever you can.
I guess I'm talking about their hypocritical ideology that uses mental gymnastics to denounce actions while committing them themselves. There's no honesty in what they do. And they're so disconnected from reality I don't think they even really understand that setting precedent (or, in this case, committing actions they themselves denounce) will just lead to the same being used against them/
I'll just bring back the old Auron MacIntyre sign tap: it's not hypocrisy, it's Hierarchy. They believe they know better and we're ontologically evil for opposing them. There is no conversation with a Mortal enemy, only different forms of combat.
I don't think I made my point very well (or at all). I'm just trying to say that actions they loudly denounce as immoral don't suddenly become moral to commit against people just because they're white.
Yeah, circumstances matter and actions that would be reprehensible against an innocent person minding their own business are justified against someone who has a gun pointed at you. But that's a rational position, and these people are not rational. In fact, they do everything in their power to destroy rationality. They're pragmatic insofar as they'll do what it takes to destroy you, but they reject pragmatism beyond that, there's no goal except to further advance the cause of irrationality and they won't stop until civilization is destroyed.
So I guess I'm saying 'Fighting my mortal enemies with any method I can' is an honest position, and 'It's okay to do this to white people because [Leftist bullshit]' is dishonest, petty, and irrational, especially from the mouths of people who have denounced exactly the same thing when it was different people doing it.
Also, 'If something is bad when your enemy does it to you, it's also bad when you do it to them' is a good rule of thumb for when you're trying to make peace - when making peace is possible. The people who claim to be pro-kindness and pro-democracy and pro-love-winning are completely on board with this sort of thing being done to white people and it's especially noxious that they refuse to understand simple concepts like conciliation and diplomacy.
I’m one of the whites who left at the beginning of 2017, and let me tell you that this is basically semantics at this point. The practice has been in place for years now.
I’m a fully qualified Chartered accountant, board certified with articles (proof that I completed a sort of apprenticeship).
I went on 24 job interviews in the month of January 2017, not one bit. Sorry whitey, back of the queue for you 🖕
The response you get is always the asinine, “Well YOUR people did it for forty years, so fair’s fair”.
My people did it for forty years yes, but at least they knew what the fuck they were doing. They built a financial and economic powerhouse at the bottom of the poorest continent in the world. It’s all well and good that everything’s “fairer” now, but it helps no one to have no food, collapsing bridges and rolling blackouts up to 18 hours a day.
But yeah, forget about reasoning with a 🦍, especially when the entire western globohomo regime still holds them up as a shining example of success.
The left will lead America down the same path
And by doing it themselves, and justifying it so, they're wholly condoning the practice and negating any grievance they had about it.
If something is bad when your enemy does it to you, it's also bad when you do it to them. The only exception to that rule is matters of necessity, such as it becomes imperative to fight your opponents with their own weapons. But this? This is petty, short-sighted, and anti-civilization. There's no pragmatism, no goal. Just spite and irrationality.
If someone declares himself to be my mortal enemy, it is good for me to kill him and bad for him to kill me.
That falls under the umbrella of pragmatism. If they're the aggressor and they've made it imperative to fight them, you should do whatever you can.
I guess I'm talking about their hypocritical ideology that uses mental gymnastics to denounce actions while committing them themselves. There's no honesty in what they do. And they're so disconnected from reality I don't think they even really understand that setting precedent (or, in this case, committing actions they themselves denounce) will just lead to the same being used against them/
I'll just bring back the old Auron MacIntyre sign tap: it's not hypocrisy, it's Hierarchy. They believe they know better and we're ontologically evil for opposing them. There is no conversation with a Mortal enemy, only different forms of combat.
Completely wrong. If someone is your enemy then nothing is off limits if it will lead to your benefit.
I don't think I made my point very well (or at all). I'm just trying to say that actions they loudly denounce as immoral don't suddenly become moral to commit against people just because they're white.
Yeah, circumstances matter and actions that would be reprehensible against an innocent person minding their own business are justified against someone who has a gun pointed at you. But that's a rational position, and these people are not rational. In fact, they do everything in their power to destroy rationality. They're pragmatic insofar as they'll do what it takes to destroy you, but they reject pragmatism beyond that, there's no goal except to further advance the cause of irrationality and they won't stop until civilization is destroyed.
So I guess I'm saying 'Fighting my mortal enemies with any method I can' is an honest position, and 'It's okay to do this to white people because [Leftist bullshit]' is dishonest, petty, and irrational, especially from the mouths of people who have denounced exactly the same thing when it was different people doing it.
Also, 'If something is bad when your enemy does it to you, it's also bad when you do it to them' is a good rule of thumb for when you're trying to make peace - when making peace is possible. The people who claim to be pro-kindness and pro-democracy and pro-love-winning are completely on board with this sort of thing being done to white people and it's especially noxious that they refuse to understand simple concepts like conciliation and diplomacy.