The rights method means the company is drained slowly and gives time for those that only work there a chance to bail and find new work while the company doesn't realise how bad the situation is before it's too late
The left's method is like dropping fireworks into someone's bedroom, it's loud, flashy and means people can't escape the company because everyone is now watching them not knowing what caused it
The right's method is far more structurally damaging, while the Left's is a more tactical attack.
The Left is going to cause people some immediate damage, but they'll move on to their next issue soon. For the most part, your objective is to counter their tactic and let them memory hole themselves
The Right's issue is far more dangerous. Thousands of people just don't say anything. They pull their money, and they don't say a word, so you can't even study the problem and come up with a solution to appease the customers.
Those surveys you fill out, where you rant and rave about how bad your service was? Those are actually important and actually read. There is nothing more terrifying to a company than losing vast sums of money and literally no one will tell you why. It causes panic, and serious structural damage if they can't figure out how to stop the bleeding.
Those surveys you fill out, where you rant and rave about how bad your service was? Those are actually important and actually read.
No, they aren't. They're used to provide "metrics" so they know who's going on the layoff list.
Besides, no one should be filling out surveys with any honesty anyway. Pollute their results with made-up answers. Make those Public Relations fucks actually work for their money.
The rights method means the company is drained slowly and gives time for those that only work there a chance to bail and find new work while the company doesn't realise how bad the situation is before it's too late
The left's method is like dropping fireworks into someone's bedroom, it's loud, flashy and means people can't escape the company because everyone is now watching them not knowing what caused it
The right's method is far more structurally damaging, while the Left's is a more tactical attack.
The Left is going to cause people some immediate damage, but they'll move on to their next issue soon. For the most part, your objective is to counter their tactic and let them memory hole themselves
The Right's issue is far more dangerous. Thousands of people just don't say anything. They pull their money, and they don't say a word, so you can't even study the problem and come up with a solution to appease the customers.
Those surveys you fill out, where you rant and rave about how bad your service was? Those are actually important and actually read. There is nothing more terrifying to a company than losing vast sums of money and literally no one will tell you why. It causes panic, and serious structural damage if they can't figure out how to stop the bleeding.
No, they aren't. They're used to provide "metrics" so they know who's going on the layoff list.
Besides, no one should be filling out surveys with any honesty anyway. Pollute their results with made-up answers. Make those Public Relations fucks actually work for their money.