I'm almost with you on the single "organized" global conspiracy, but I don't want to discount the fact the secret societies and cults have been directing events in various nations since the beginning of history. Globalization and instant communication only makes it more likely that various layers of influence networks would form around groups of world elites who share those same "parameters", and attempt to architect things at the ground level, if not at the macro level. It's feels more crazy to believe that world events aren't shaped by 10,000 conspiracies every day. The only thing giving us normal plebs ease of mind on this is realizing that 1) Elite plans usually aren't that effective, nor directly in control 2) There's not a single group guiding everything behind-the-scenes, and 3) The groups that do have high influence are often in conflict with other groups. Influence networks work in two directions.
So for example you don't have the annual WEF meeting headed by Klaus saying "Ok guys, how can we get zem to eat ze bugs by 2030?" You do have misanthropic elites with weird ideological bents at the top levels who think they're saving the planet, combined with others who have been swayed and bought into those ideas to such a degree that they financially benefit, who then arrange private talks and consensus with their colleagues to push small ideas out to the greater WEF membership, which influence politicians to gradually inch policy closer to goals that align with the misanthropes. tl;dr The global population may be like ants acting on instinct and inertia and with no real concerted plan, but there are actors consciously working together (conspiring) to place pheromones in just the right spots to get us to move in the direction they want. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't.
I'm almost with you on the single "organized" global conspiracy, but I don't want to discount the fact the secret societies and cults have been directing events in various nations since the beginning of history. Globalization and instant communication only makes it more likely that various layers of influence networks would form around groups of world elites who share those same "parameters", and attempt to architect things at the ground level, if not at the macro level. It's feels more crazy to believe that world events aren't shaped by 10,000 conspiracies every day. The only thing giving us normal plebs ease of mind on this is realizing that 1) Elite plans usually aren't that effective, nor directly in control 2) There's not a single group guiding everything behind-the-scenes, and 3) The groups that do have high influence are often in conflict with other groups. Influence networks work in two directions.
So for example you don't have the annual WEF meeting headed by Klaus saying "Ok guys, how can we get zem to eat ze bugs by 2030?" You do have misanthropic elites with weird ideological bents at the top levels who think they're saving the planet, combined with others who have been swayed and bought into those ideas to such a degree that they financially benefit, who then arrange private talks and consensus with their colleagues to push small ideas out to the greater WEF membership, which influence politicians to gradually inch policy closer to goals that align with the misanthropes. tl;dr The global population may be like ants acting on instinct and inertia and with no real concerted plan, but there are actors consciously working together (conspiring) to place pheromones in just the right spots to get us to move in the direction they want. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't.