If people are not objects, how can looking at an object translate to how I treat people?
Either I'm projecting the idea of "sexy woman" onto a drawing, thus anthropomorphing the drawing, or I'm treating the actual woman as a "sexual object", whatever that's supposed to mean.
Regardless, I'm supposedly conflating women and objects which results in the problem being discussed. If I don't then there's no problem because I treat the two differently.
So it's apparent that people can be treated as objects, even if they aren't, and there's no reason a woman can't treat herself as an object, as is the case here.
If people are not objects, how can looking at an object translate to how I treat people?
Either I'm projecting the idea of "sexy woman" onto a drawing, thus anthropomorphing the drawing, or I'm treating the actual woman as a "sexual object", whatever that's supposed to mean.
Regardless, I'm supposedly conflating women and objects which results in the problem being discussed. If I don't then there's no problem because I treat the two differently.
So it's apparent that people can be treated as objects, even if they aren't, and there's no reason a woman can't treat herself as an object, as is the case here.