So screw the first amendment I guess. Does anyone have any data to debunk the whole “white supremacist groups are the most dangerous”. I know they throw that talking point out there but I’m skeptical since that is the narrative they want to push
They fabricate the data. The feds created a new category called “domestic extremist”, and the criteria preclude anyone who isn’t white and conservative. Therefore, white conservatives make up virtually all domestic extremists. Therefore, white conservatives are the greatest threat to the nation. Never mind two billion dollars in damages from BLM riots. Rural whites are the real danger.
Feds do the same thing with hate crimes. Black on white crime is almost never classified as hate crime - even when the black offender is very clear about his or her anti-white motivation - while white on black crime is constantly given the hate designation. End result: almost all hate crimes are white on black. How is that even possible when interracial violence is dominated by black offenders?
Leftism is just inversion of our observable reality. Literally everyone knows who is dangerous and who isn’t. That’s why it costs more money to live in white neighborhoods and attend white schools. When it comes to the biggest purchase in their lives, or the futures of their children, people want white spaces. If we were so threatening, this would never be the case.
Thanks. My rule of thumb has been to be very skeptical anyway because they so badly want there to be white supremacists around every corner. Prime example would be the Jessie Smollet case. The media was so excited to go along with it when any sane person could see it sounded ridiculous. Or when Larry Elder ran for governor and they called him the black face of white supremacy
The government was ordered by a court to release that data. Only 6% of their “white terrorists” were in any way related to terrorism. Most of those terrorists were ecological terrorists.
On a per-capita basis, all the data always starts from 2002…
Because we know <censored religion> kills the most if we look at all the data.
So screw the first amendment I guess. Does anyone have any data to debunk the whole “white supremacist groups are the most dangerous”. I know they throw that talking point out there but I’m skeptical since that is the narrative they want to push
They fabricate the data. The feds created a new category called “domestic extremist”, and the criteria preclude anyone who isn’t white and conservative. Therefore, white conservatives make up virtually all domestic extremists. Therefore, white conservatives are the greatest threat to the nation. Never mind two billion dollars in damages from BLM riots. Rural whites are the real danger.
Feds do the same thing with hate crimes. Black on white crime is almost never classified as hate crime - even when the black offender is very clear about his or her anti-white motivation - while white on black crime is constantly given the hate designation. End result: almost all hate crimes are white on black. How is that even possible when interracial violence is dominated by black offenders?
Leftism is just inversion of our observable reality. Literally everyone knows who is dangerous and who isn’t. That’s why it costs more money to live in white neighborhoods and attend white schools. When it comes to the biggest purchase in their lives, or the futures of their children, people want white spaces. If we were so threatening, this would never be the case.
Thanks. My rule of thumb has been to be very skeptical anyway because they so badly want there to be white supremacists around every corner. Prime example would be the Jessie Smollet case. The media was so excited to go along with it when any sane person could see it sounded ridiculous. Or when Larry Elder ran for governor and they called him the black face of white supremacy
https://nationaljusticeparty.com/2023/05/10/court-documents-prove-feds-are-fabricating-domestic-terrorism-statistics/
The government was ordered by a court to release that data. Only 6% of their “white terrorists” were in any way related to terrorism. Most of those terrorists were ecological terrorists.
On a per-capita basis, all the data always starts from 2002…
Because we know <censored religion> kills the most if we look at all the data.
Thank you. I know some people I can show this to
Thanks