As others have pointed out, OP's writing ability is comically bad. The college he attends should be ashamed of themselves.

I listened to the Richard Reeves Male Inequality video, and while it's interesting I think there's a serious danger that it could start the conversation off in a really negative way. If you search just on reddit for Richard Reeves you'll find a lot of anti feminists raging about the content of that video and his book, or just bouncing off it's existence to have one of their standard rants. Here's one example I found . . . .

“When men outperform women, it’s discrimination and oppression! Women are being held back , waaaaaa! When women outperform men, that’s the way it should’ve always been. Women are just better “ Feminist logic in a nutshell, they don’t preach equality, they enjoy domination and they’ll fight to keep that domination going."

I know I sound really negative, but there's a real chance your event could go seriously off the rails if you don't throughly consider the audience, the content, what you believe the objectives and outputs are, how you'll moderate the conversation, and how you'll deal with any disruption.

I like how she doesn't even attempt to explain why that's incorrect. (Obviously we know she doesn't try because it's true and any attempt to explain it away will lead her sounding like a dumbass.)