Or is it? You assume that the poster comes from a place of good faith and actually thinks there's a possibility that men can benefit from feminism.
Plot twist: There isn't and the poster is aware. They don't care one bit about men, except how to extract their work and resources.
The poster knows that men are the enemy because feminism has declared men the enemy from the get go. The only problem is that most men are not aware that they are the enemy.
"Make sure you frame the problems facing men in a very specific structured and controlled way. If you point out these realities but let them think for themselves in even the slightest capacity or allow any free dialog, they'll immediately become your enemy." That's quite the lack of self-awareness.
It's SOP, too. I've seen nearly that exact response whenever any similar question comes up. It's actually remarkably consistent: "Use a moderator with an iron fist to make sure you're only talking about the exact issues you want, in the way you want." It's how they roll.
Or is it? You assume that the poster comes from a place of good faith and actually thinks there's a possibility that men can benefit from feminism.
Plot twist: There isn't and the poster is aware. They don't care one bit about men, except how to extract their work and resources.
The poster knows that men are the enemy because feminism has declared men the enemy from the get go. The only problem is that most men are not aware that they are the enemy.
It's SOP, too. I've seen nearly that exact response whenever any similar question comes up. It's actually remarkably consistent: "Use a moderator with an iron fist to make sure you're only talking about the exact issues you want, in the way you want." It's how they roll.