Yep, they just had to find any chain of words that could end in “and therefore this is problematic.” That’s basically their one rhetorical move.
Here they had to force a very square peg of an argument through a round hole, but it’s only important that someone vaguely smart-sounding is saying the thing is problematic. That way Generation TL;DR has something they can vaguely point to that they think defeats the original chart. It’s marketing strategy 101, just get ANY counter-narrative out there, most people won’t read it and the people it’s for (wokesters) will just assume it’s true because they are already on the “it must be problematic” side just from sheer bias. This guy just did the service of providing the thing they can vaguely point to.
the guy is self-owning even harder... if you add same-race crime data, you'd basically see that white-on-black crime is a rounding error when it comes to all crimes suffered by blacks.
They know there’s no defense so they flip the chessboard and scream racism
Yep, they just had to find any chain of words that could end in “and therefore this is problematic.” That’s basically their one rhetorical move.
Here they had to force a very square peg of an argument through a round hole, but it’s only important that someone vaguely smart-sounding is saying the thing is problematic. That way Generation TL;DR has something they can vaguely point to that they think defeats the original chart. It’s marketing strategy 101, just get ANY counter-narrative out there, most people won’t read it and the people it’s for (wokesters) will just assume it’s true because they are already on the “it must be problematic” side just from sheer bias. This guy just did the service of providing the thing they can vaguely point to.
the guy is self-owning even harder... if you add same-race crime data, you'd basically see that white-on-black crime is a rounding error when it comes to all crimes suffered by blacks.