The last one is going to do most of the narrowing. Not obese would eliminate 2/3 of all women, although the stats might be a bit better for the 25-30 group. There is a calculator for women somewhere, but I don't have a link unfortunately. I remember seeing a bunch of women circle jerking about how men's requirements eliminate all but 20% or so of women. The hilarious part is women's requirements left a fraction of a percent of men. But somehow men are the picky ones.
That's the thing about the 80/20 rule (although there's evidence that it's more like the 95/5 rule these days). It's not the top x% of men, it's the top x% of every single category which is how you get those tiny numbers for women. When a woman wants, say, a man who's 6' or taller that's not a problem on its own. That's about the 85th percentile, so they still have 15% left to choose from. It's not a huge proportion, but it's doable if height is the most important thing and she's willing to compromise on other qualities. That means she might have have to accept a face that's not male model tier, a body that doesn't belong to a roided up douchebag, or a sub-$100k income. Of course she won't compromise on those other qualities, because she feels entitled to gigachad. When women say they can't find good men, what they really mean is the only men offering her commitment are icky betas instead of the gigachad that feminism has taught her that she's owed.
remember seeing a bunch of women circle jerking about how men's requirements eliminate all but 20% or so of women. The hilarious part is women's requirements left a fraction of a percent of men. But somehow men are the picky ones.
what men find physically attractive in a woman varries much more than what women find attractive in men. No women like short men, no women like skinny [scrawny] men, no women like pudgy/dad-bod men. The "free because you are the product they are selling" dating site OK Cupid used to have a blog that analyzed everything about its users, turns out men rate womens attractiveness on a bell curve, and women rate 80% of all men "less than average" attractiveness.
Women in general dont have the self reflection to understand they are all chasing these top 1%ers of men and if they want to keep him for a lifetime and not just one night they have to be a top woman themselves. But they are told since before they are teenagers that they are perfect and dont need to change or improve anything.
Also both men and women do this: they believe what they find attractive in the opposite sex, the opposite sex finds attractive in them. Women think men find a tall, aggressive, highly educated, world traveled/experienced, career driven woman attractive because it is what they find attractive in men. And men, however cliche it is, think women like men who are "nice".... surprisingly that trait is very low on womens list of desires, and ask any woman about her ex, she will without a doubt say he was "an abusive jerk".... you dated him sweetheart, what does that say about what you desire in a man?
Its a sad state of affairs modern dating has become
The last one is going to do most of the narrowing. Not obese would eliminate 2/3 of all women, although the stats might be a bit better for the 25-30 group. There is a calculator for women somewhere, but I don't have a link unfortunately. I remember seeing a bunch of women circle jerking about how men's requirements eliminate all but 20% or so of women. The hilarious part is women's requirements left a fraction of a percent of men. But somehow men are the picky ones.
That's the thing about the 80/20 rule (although there's evidence that it's more like the 95/5 rule these days). It's not the top x% of men, it's the top x% of every single category which is how you get those tiny numbers for women. When a woman wants, say, a man who's 6' or taller that's not a problem on its own. That's about the 85th percentile, so they still have 15% left to choose from. It's not a huge proportion, but it's doable if height is the most important thing and she's willing to compromise on other qualities. That means she might have have to accept a face that's not male model tier, a body that doesn't belong to a roided up douchebag, or a sub-$100k income. Of course she won't compromise on those other qualities, because she feels entitled to gigachad. When women say they can't find good men, what they really mean is the only men offering her commitment are icky betas instead of the gigachad that feminism has taught her that she's owed.
what men find physically attractive in a woman varries much more than what women find attractive in men. No women like short men, no women like skinny [scrawny] men, no women like pudgy/dad-bod men. The "free because you are the product they are selling" dating site OK Cupid used to have a blog that analyzed everything about its users, turns out men rate womens attractiveness on a bell curve, and women rate 80% of all men "less than average" attractiveness.
Women in general dont have the self reflection to understand they are all chasing these top 1%ers of men and if they want to keep him for a lifetime and not just one night they have to be a top woman themselves. But they are told since before they are teenagers that they are perfect and dont need to change or improve anything.
Also both men and women do this: they believe what they find attractive in the opposite sex, the opposite sex finds attractive in them. Women think men find a tall, aggressive, highly educated, world traveled/experienced, career driven woman attractive because it is what they find attractive in men. And men, however cliche it is, think women like men who are "nice".... surprisingly that trait is very low on womens list of desires, and ask any woman about her ex, she will without a doubt say he was "an abusive jerk".... you dated him sweetheart, what does that say about what you desire in a man?
Its a sad state of affairs modern dating has become