The problem with basing pay on literacy and math rates is that you're basically paying the teachers based on how shitty their school's demographics are. Unless the goal is to just drastically cut wasteful spending by not pouring money into trying to educate sub-humans, which I guess makes sense.
Frankly yes and it's the teachers fault anyway for not making sure the rates are going up. The problem we have right now is that the schools are very much getting their money based on whether or not the students have a pulse and this leads the schools to just fill the seats with whoever or worse they mark them as attending when they haven't shown up for months. Earnest students as well who are just trying to go about their day shouldn't have to be forced to attend these shitholes due to truancy laws, I'd rather see it all turn to dust.
The problem with basing pay on literacy and math rates is that you're basically paying the teachers based on how shitty their school's demographics are. Unless the goal is to just drastically cut wasteful spending by not pouring money into trying to educate sub-humans, which I guess makes sense.
Frankly yes and it's the teachers fault anyway for not making sure the rates are going up. The problem we have right now is that the schools are very much getting their money based on whether or not the students have a pulse and this leads the schools to just fill the seats with whoever or worse they mark them as attending when they haven't shown up for months. Earnest students as well who are just trying to go about their day shouldn't have to be forced to attend these shitholes due to truancy laws, I'd rather see it all turn to dust.
I absolutely disagree. There's only so much you can do to improve the rates when your students are averaging an IQ of 70.