Why do I even bother talking to you when you cannot understand that Trump and a non Trump candidate have different chances of winning despite the mail in ballots.
You think no one else can win because Trump will lose.
Idk man, you chose to respond to me and then repeated the same inane ramble a second time as if it would somehow be truer if you said it again.
While ignoring the point being made so you can assume "must be a Trumper."
Here is a hint for you, if they need to cheat 3 million votes instead of only 1 million because the other guy was way more popular it doesn't change the result or matter in the slightest.
Ah yes, because there is a set limit for fraud they we just need to beat and we win at that point. At which time they will simply throw up their hands, say drat, and let us have it.
If they had the capacity for infinite fraud, the Dems would choose to win every single race in America. They obviously don't care about subletly or avoiding the veneer of shadiness.
Clear from looking at the swing states in 2020 and 2022 the issue of fraud is only decisive in extremely close races.
One can argue that Abe Hamadeh was screwed out his AZ AG race in 2022 based on how razor thin close the margin was and that shady shit happened on election day in Maricopa.
The problem is you lot making that argument for every single race.
Are you going to say that Tudor Dixon or Doug Mastriano were cheated out of their races in MI and PA when they lost by double digits?
Maybe nominating someone for 2024 who is not vehemently hated by most of the country can help ensure that a future race is not razor thin close where fraud makes a diffference.
Why do I even bother talking to you when you cannot understand that Trump and a non Trump candidate have different chances of winning despite the mail in ballots.
You think no one else can win because Trump will lose.
This is the mistake you are making.
Idk man, you chose to respond to me and then repeated the same inane ramble a second time as if it would somehow be truer if you said it again.
While ignoring the point being made so you can assume "must be a Trumper."
Here is a hint for you, if they need to cheat 3 million votes instead of only 1 million because the other guy was way more popular it doesn't change the result or matter in the slightest.
You are not capable of realizing that a different non Trump candidate can potentially win past the margin of fraud in 2024.
You think no candidate can win because that it is what allows you to nominate Trump again and when he loses again you guys can claim no one can win.
This is the definition of insanity.
Have a good day.
Ah yes, because there is a set limit for fraud they we just need to beat and we win at that point. At which time they will simply throw up their hands, say drat, and let us have it.
Truly I am the insane one.
If they had the capacity for infinite fraud, the Dems would choose to win every single race in America. They obviously don't care about subletly or avoiding the veneer of shadiness.
Clear from looking at the swing states in 2020 and 2022 the issue of fraud is only decisive in extremely close races.
One can argue that Abe Hamadeh was screwed out his AZ AG race in 2022 based on how razor thin close the margin was and that shady shit happened on election day in Maricopa.
The problem is you lot making that argument for every single race.
Are you going to say that Tudor Dixon or Doug Mastriano were cheated out of their races in MI and PA when they lost by double digits?
Maybe nominating someone for 2024 who is not vehemently hated by most of the country can help ensure that a future race is not razor thin close where fraud makes a diffference.