It gets so much worse if you read the story and not go off just the headline.
has been accused of storing child porn on her personal devices and molesting young children, some of whom are autistic.
So it's not just molesting autistic kids, but also possessing cp.
a report that 30-year-old Leomeir Kennedy had molested at least three children in the last several years. Kennedy had allegedly admitted the assaults to a spiritual advisor, who then encouraged her to confess to the parents of her first victim: a 1-year-old girl whom Kennedy regularly babysat in 2017. Kennedy reportedly molested the girl once while changing her diaper.
Arrest that advisor.
Kennedy then left the state for a while and returned to Indiana about a year ago. She then found a job at Hopebridge Autism Therapy Center, where she worked as a licensed behavior technician.
Background checks? What are those?
During her time at Hopebridge, Kennedy claimed that she was careful not to molest the children assigned to her care. Instead, she frequently offered to cover for other employees during their lunch break. By covering those shifts, Kenney was able to secure time alone with two autistic children, one nonverbal and one semi-verbal, whom she then molested, reports say.
That sounds like an extremely evil interpretation of a loophole.
"THEY WEREN'T KIDS IN MY CARE!"
On one occasion, a Hopebridge employee supposedly walked in as Kennedy was molesting one of the autistic children. Kennedy then pretended to tickle the child and claimed the girl had moved Kennedy's hand toward her genitals. Kennedy suggested that the girl did so because she had been molested by someone else in the past.
So victim blaming an autistic child and suggesting it's because of previous history of abuse. That's two attempts at deflection.
After police received these disturbing reports, they confiscated Kennedy's cellphone and laptop. On the devices, they reportedly discovered a picture of the 1-year-old girl, whom Kennedy had babysat several years ago, naked.
Minor [pun not intended] quibble but why structure the sentence like that and mention the babysitting between the subject and context? Surely "of the 1-year-old girl naked, whom Kennedy had baby sat" would not only work in a similar way but also not possibly suggest it was Kennedy who was naked?
They also reportedly found a search for an image of a 13-year-old being gangraped as well as several digital conversations with other alleged child molesters. During those conversations, Kennedy received two pornographic images of "very young children," police claimed.
When confronted with the evidence against her, Kennedy supposedly confessed to the assaults. She claimed that she had been molested as a child and had sought counseling from the spiritual advisor to rid her of the "snakes and shadows" which had plagued her since childhood.
Playing the victim card as well as trying to slide mental illness in there. Of course the mental illness won't ever be attributed to the trans connection going on here, or the more generally common connection between LGBT status and a history of abuse.
She also reportedly admitted that she applied for a job at Hopebridge because she thought she would find a "victim pool" there and that molesting one the autistic children made her feel like "Christmas."
You know what Christmas has a lot of?
Woodchippers.
On April 12, Kennedy was arrested and charged with three counts of molesting a child and one count of possessing child pornography. She is being held without bond since she allegedly told someone via text message that she planned to leave the state. She also has few personal connections in Indiana. Reporter Andy Ngo claimed that Kennedy had previously lived in Vancouver, Washington.
How does "a picture of the 1-year-old", an "image of a 13-year-old", and "two pornographic images of "very young children"" only count as a single charge of possessing cp? I'm sure there have been cases in the past where someone has been charged on not only a picture by picture count but also a frame by frame count for any video content that might exist. So someone with a one minute long video that runs at 60 fps ends up with 3600 charges.
Ngo also reported that Leomeir Kennedy is a biological female who was previously known as Allison. To support his claims, Ngo provided screenshots of a Pinterest account on which Kennedy reportedly chronicled her transition from female to male. Ngo also reported that Johnson County documents list Kennedy as a "trans male," but jail records do not list a gender for Kennedy at all. Other outlets reporting on the story have referred to Kennedy as male and have not mentioned whether she ever lived as female, though Daily Journal did confirm that Kennedy has "lived in multiple other states."
I'm sure those omissions are entirely accidental and not the result of some ideology that would want to distance itself from things that never happen happening 🙄
Meh, that's enough reviewing of the article, I'm tired from today so there might be more I could bring up from this but I need sleep and want to review my MCU male/female death count post from a while ago more than read this kind of horror story that never happens.
It gets so much worse if you read the story and not go off just the headline.
So it's not just molesting autistic kids, but also possessing cp.
Arrest that advisor.
Background checks? What are those?
That sounds like an extremely evil interpretation of a loophole.
"THEY WEREN'T KIDS IN MY CARE!"
So victim blaming an autistic child and suggesting it's because of previous history of abuse. That's two attempts at deflection.
Minor [pun not intended] quibble but why structure the sentence like that and mention the babysitting between the subject and context? Surely "of the 1-year-old girl naked, whom Kennedy had baby sat" would not only work in a similar way but also not possibly suggest it was Kennedy who was naked?
Playing the victim card as well as trying to slide mental illness in there. Of course the mental illness won't ever be attributed to the trans connection going on here, or the more generally common connection between LGBT status and a history of abuse.
You know what Christmas has a lot of?
Woodchippers.
How does "a picture of the 1-year-old", an "image of a 13-year-old", and "two pornographic images of "very young children"" only count as a single charge of possessing cp? I'm sure there have been cases in the past where someone has been charged on not only a picture by picture count but also a frame by frame count for any video content that might exist. So someone with a one minute long video that runs at 60 fps ends up with 3600 charges.
I'm sure those omissions are entirely accidental and not the result of some ideology that would want to distance itself from things that never happen happening 🙄
Meh, that's enough reviewing of the article, I'm tired from today so there might be more I could bring up from this but I need sleep and want to review my MCU male/female death count post from a while ago more than read this kind of horror story that never happens.
we need an army of gary plauches