I didn't wanna get involved because god damn that was a massive thread, but it does get me thinking: does fictional media have any influence in the things that people do?
I say yes, if only because the left has been programmed through the Long March through both fictional and nonfictional media, hundreds of shows, etc, and the impact of fictional media on people should be quite obvious, considering we boycott shows for being woke and whatnot, but I guess what I’m trying to ask is how much of an influence is it, and is it worth regulating, why or why not?
I know people on both aspects of that whole loli debate, I know people who like lolis that have had to report people to the cops for pedo shit, and I know a loli lover who admitted to “guiding” someone through their transition, so I can’t say that I really have my own opinion on it tbh, I just think that the issue is gonna come up at some point because if society ever does come back to normal, we’re gonna have to deal with “the people who were trying to enduce my child into transitioning watch these weird Japanese cartoons and the weird Japanese cartoons have depictions of young kids in sexual situations”.
/u/Steampunk_Moustache actually brought up something that I honestly never thought about, and well, maybe they can explain it better here than in that chaotic mess of a thread. What exactly makes art so different? Like it was mentioned several times that anime characters look nothing like actual people (which very much depends on the anime and is not a universal thing), but imo, a human is still a human, so does that matter that much? Like I can go on Twitter or Insta and go searching for a few hundred cosplay girls that either naturally have anime girl bodies or got work done for it, but is it just the literal art styles you’re talking about? I’m gonna stop rambling and let this thread be the thread, as I wanna see this discussion.
Yup, my feelings exactly. I wasn't even going to mention the word, but you already did so...the "loli" debate always gets people on both sides worked up big time, everyone is calling everyone a pedo, and it gets weirder and less pleasant from there. Didn't feel like getting involved this time.
As to your question...to some extent? I think it mostly depends on the person, though. There are people who will be influenced big time by anything that can touch them, and there are people who won't really be influenced by things much at all. So, the more widespread or mainstream something is, the more people it's going to affect. So in that sense, sure, there's some concern. But I think the bigger concern is the people who get affected, as they likely would have been affected by something else anyway.
It's just like with blaming guns, video games, religion, etc. The issue always comes down to that person. No one has shot up a school because of guns or video games or religion, even if they themselves say so. With rounding, 100% of the people who play violent video games never kill anyone, for example. You could play shooters for eight hours a day for weeks (wouldn't recommend, though) and, well, you'd probably get pretty fucking loopy. But you're not going to go out and kill a bunch of people...unless you were already very twisted to begin with.
So, it's really complicated? Does media influence people? Absolutely. It wouldn't even exist if it didn't; the whole point is to have an impact on you to some extent. But it's generally only going to influence people to an unhealthy degree who were already unhealthy.
At least that's my take.
To be clear: accusing someone of being a pedo because they object to illustrations of child pornography is 100% retarded.
The only reason people are doing this (which I don’t agree with but I get why because of that) is because of the whole “reset the clock” thing where a bunch of male feminists and anti-loli people got caught being predators.