/u/DonuteaterReturns is correct. People misunderstand the results of the 2020 riots.
Every place that had major rioting was already a Democratic hive, but worse: when the results came in, they voted more Left wing. Not less. I expected the opposite, and I was completely wrong.
This is because Democrats are both cowardly and authoritarian; and as such want to vote for the side they perceive is winning or strong. Unfortunately, if a woman is beaten, she sees her attacker as strong, herself as weak, and will acquiesce to protect herself. A man in the same position will feel that he is strong, but has been emasculated, and will demand vengeance. When you multiply that feminine acquiescence to a deference to power through Leftist ideology (which derives everything from power relationships), then you get people who will literally blame themselves for getting beaten.
Worse, right-wingers have an innate drive as "conservative minded" people to hunker down, or even withdraw to a safer place, rather than to fight back.
The result is that places that encountered riots in 2020 became more Democratic controlled because Right-wingers fled, and Left-wingers acquiesced to the rioters, who claimed both power and authority.
The most dangerous thing to understand is that the riots solidified Democrat control wherever they took place. Rioting worked. That is the lesson that will echo through the Dem's halls of power.
I genuinely wish I was wrong about this, but you can check county by county.
What this means for this woman is that she will either flee, or she will acquiesce that she deserved to be beaten. Even if she flees, there's no guarantee that she will stop voting Democrat because voting Democrat is emotionally tied to being a good person in most of their minds.
/u/DonuteaterReturns is correct. People misunderstand the results of the 2020 riots.
Every place that had major rioting was already a Democratic hive, but worse: when the results came in, they voted more Left wing. Not less. I expected the opposite, and I was completely wrong.
This is because Democrats are both cowardly and authoritarian; and as such want to vote for the side they perceive is winning or strong. Unfortunately, if a woman is beaten, she sees her attacker as strong, herself as weak, and will acquiesce to protect herself. A man in the same position will feel that he is strong, but has been emasculated, and will demand vengeance. When you multiply that feminine acquiescence to a deference to power through Leftist ideology (which derives everything from power relationships), then you get people who will literally blame themselves for getting beaten.
Worse, right-wingers have an innate drive as "conservative minded" people to hunker down, or even withdraw to a safer place, rather than to fight back.
The result is that places that encountered riots in 2020 became more Democratic controlled because Right-wingers fled, and Left-wingers acquiesced to the rioters, who claimed both power and authority.
The most dangerous thing to understand is that the riots solidified Democrat control wherever they took place. Rioting worked. That is the lesson that will echo through the Dem's halls of power.
I genuinely wish I was wrong about this, but you can check county by county.
What this means for this woman is that she will either flee, or she will acquiesce that she deserved to be beaten. Even if she flees, there's no guarantee that she will stop voting Democrat because voting Democrat is emotionally tied to being a good person in most of their minds.