I’m an old competitor and still a fan of a sport that’s recently seen a number of trannies try to force their way into the women’s side of the sport. I post frequently on our sport’s top Internet forum arguing against that sort of shit, and while the number of POSTS is often 50-50 for or against, the forum includes an upvote/downvote feature and based on that you can tell most human beings are on our side of the question. Not everyone wants to put their opinion under their name or has the energy to participate in debate, but everyone has eyes, ears, and a brain and I’m convinced if you could anonymously poll the entire world, pro-trans would barely crack 20 percent at best, and that’s just “generally I don’t mind the idea of people being trans.” Specify a question like “should trans women compete in women’s sports” and I think the overwhelming majority voting no would shock the pro-trans activists who think that because the Internet is rife with faggotry that they are winning the hearts and minds of regular people.
It's like subject like the death penalty, if you have it as a vague question, you get more of a split in the results
But if you quantify it (e.g. should the death penalty be an option for a tried and convicted beyond doubt pedophile) and then it becomes an overwhelming majority. It's how the left feign a majority by keeping everything vague than going through everything on a case by case basis.
Along with meaningless phrases to shroud their true intentions.
Love is love! (shrouding their push for pedophilia. What are you, against love, bigot?)
Then "anti" (trans) and "dis" (information) are attached to anything their opponents are for, to try and cause a negative emotion in the public mind toward actual morality and truth, aka Satanic inversion.
I’m an old competitor and still a fan of a sport that’s recently seen a number of trannies try to force their way into the women’s side of the sport. I post frequently on our sport’s top Internet forum arguing against that sort of shit, and while the number of POSTS is often 50-50 for or against, the forum includes an upvote/downvote feature and based on that you can tell most human beings are on our side of the question. Not everyone wants to put their opinion under their name or has the energy to participate in debate, but everyone has eyes, ears, and a brain and I’m convinced if you could anonymously poll the entire world, pro-trans would barely crack 20 percent at best, and that’s just “generally I don’t mind the idea of people being trans.” Specify a question like “should trans women compete in women’s sports” and I think the overwhelming majority voting no would shock the pro-trans activists who think that because the Internet is rife with faggotry that they are winning the hearts and minds of regular people.
It's like subject like the death penalty, if you have it as a vague question, you get more of a split in the results
But if you quantify it (e.g. should the death penalty be an option for a tried and convicted beyond doubt pedophile) and then it becomes an overwhelming majority. It's how the left feign a majority by keeping everything vague than going through everything on a case by case basis.
Along with meaningless phrases to shroud their true intentions.
Love is love! (shrouding their push for pedophilia. What are you, against love, bigot?)
Then "anti" (trans) and "dis" (information) are attached to anything their opponents are for, to try and cause a negative emotion in the public mind toward actual morality and truth, aka Satanic inversion.