>believing the corrupt judges in the inevitable lawsuit waged against you will care what excuse you use for why your organisation doesn't have enough women
I don't need to get rid of all of them. You might want to, but I just want the dead weight cut. The trick is to fire the worst ones last, because the ones who might have won a lawsuit will have moved on by that point.
If they sue, show up to court with boxes of written warnings.
The real trick is to make the positions of the ones who are merely entitled and incompetent redundant, because they weren't getting any work done anyways. You don't have to justify downsizing the same way you do firings in a lawsuit.
You'd be sued so fast for "sex discrimination".
Unlike you, most of us are smart enough not to do it immediately and not to do it without legally-justifiable cause.
Just shed 10% of the dead weight every month for the next year, starting after two months so the goldfish have forgotten about it.
>believing the corrupt judges in the inevitable lawsuit waged against you will care what excuse you use for why your organisation doesn't have enough women
And you call yourself smart.
You can't get rid of every woman, regardless of how slow or what excuse you use.
I don't need to get rid of all of them. You might want to, but I just want the dead weight cut. The trick is to fire the worst ones last, because the ones who might have won a lawsuit will have moved on by that point.
If they sue, show up to court with boxes of written warnings.
The real trick is to make the positions of the ones who are merely entitled and incompetent redundant, because they weren't getting any work done anyways. You don't have to justify downsizing the same way you do firings in a lawsuit.