How INTERESTING that they decided to leave instead of proving in court that Twitter deliberately defamed them by lying with the intention of causing damages. Interesting since that's exactly how they frame it, which would make it illegal. It's almost as though their own lawyers agree that a court would agree that they are State Affiliated Media
Haha I guess sometimes there’s a bit of a gulf between “what we’re willing to say in a news release to our fans” vs “what we’re willing to say in a court of law under oath and with a burden of proof.”
This is what the normies don't see that we do, they just glance at these defensive news articles that are written by the press and assume they're telling the truth after they get called out and ignore everything else. We however are autistic enough to pay attention to their background activity which gets shadier every time you look at it in detail.
How INTERESTING that they decided to leave instead of proving in court that Twitter deliberately defamed them by lying with the intention of causing damages. Interesting since that's exactly how they frame it, which would make it illegal. It's almost as though their own lawyers agree that a court would agree that they are State Affiliated Media
Haha I guess sometimes there’s a bit of a gulf between “what we’re willing to say in a news release to our fans” vs “what we’re willing to say in a court of law under oath and with a burden of proof.”
This is what the normies don't see that we do, they just glance at these defensive news articles that are written by the press and assume they're telling the truth after they get called out and ignore everything else. We however are autistic enough to pay attention to their background activity which gets shadier every time you look at it in detail.
The left is always stretching rhetorically, usually to claim a bailey from their latest motte.