I'm just pointing out how libertarian types (small government) often still promote moral authority on the people, which isn't small government so there's a logical incongruency in their political stance. It can be spoken to, sure, but usually it's a lot of mental gymnastics to basically say they believe in small government in certain respects and big government in other respects. In the end, it's just big government, another way.

I'm saying National Socialists at least don't try to pretend they're for small government and are 100% honest that they like big government which makes them more honest and logically sound in their political stance compared to libertarians, imo.

The reason I made the comparison is because usually libertarians see National Socialists as their antithesis and I'm saying at least your political rival is more forthright in their intentions.