Found this article pretty funny, this journalism must be pretty dense or selectively ignorant on YouTube's rabbit hole algorithm.
They play shocked when after an hour of going through random videos they get one about Andrew Tate.
Also I'm pretty sure you select what videos to watch on YT shorts, so the fact that they're getting more and more as the experiment continues- it just shows that they had a bias of selecting the ones they wanted to prove a point with.
And I also find it pretty funny that it isn't just Andrew Tate and his brother who are banned, it's him entirely even if it's a proxy person uploading clips which have him in it. Absolutely mental
Yet, I wonder why they'll never do this with a 13 year old girl. Maybe girls transing themselves from YT propaganda isn't good news yet?
I'm not even on board with the whole Andrew Tate thing he's a net negative. The thing is, what content is there even for 13 year old boys? Maybe some anime, but many are not at all interested in that, think it's gay, or whatever. Beyond that, you've got Andrew Tate or woke indoctrination. That's it. My teen cousin goes in and out through interest in Tate's stuff, "omg his Bugatti is cool type stuff" etc., because there really is nothing else.
I don't watch his stuff outside of the occasional random clip I'll come across, but I don't agree with this.
I've seen numerous workout videos posted by young men who reference Tate as their motivation to start lifting. The comment section is always flooded with more young men who say the same thing.
Tate strikes me as a douche bag who lies about his wealth, but young men/teens are clearly desperate for someone to tell them it's good to be masculine.
What's shocking to me is how fast the "right" echo's the left when Tate comes up.
sexist! Muhsogyny! Trafficks wahmen! Pronz! Bald! Beta!
Instead of seeing that he is inspiring scores of young men not to be betas losers.