Obvious answer: institutional backing.
But I wonder why troons succeeded in garnering this kind of support while furries failed. I pull a complete blank on why. If anything, the ridiculousness of denying one's own gender is just as ridiculous as denying one's own species.
The similarities are uncanny:
- Origins in the pride/gay rights bullshit
- Delusions of self: "I am not what I am, I am what I imagine."
- Cluster effect: exposure to trannies creates trannies, just like exposure to furries creates furries.
- Insufferable personalities and overbearing self-inserting into normal spaces.
- Claiming negative reactions of the previous point as prosecution. "Literal Trans Genocide" vs "Fursecution"
- Expensive conversion to one's perfect form: Chopadickectomy vs full body Fursuit.
- Abject degenerate sexual tendencies with zero self restraint
- Subversive even to the concept of normality, seemingly proud to be a deviant.
- Riddled with mental illness: anxiety, depression, prone to violence
Because they're not backed up by big pharma.
Look, the endgame of T is simple - if trans rights are human rights then everybody who's trans deserves a free transition and lifetime support in terms of drugs etc. That's turns a perfectly healthy person into a farming animal and that's great.
And government angle is important because this way they'll be able to set up unreasonable prices (all paid by taxpayers money or all printed - who cares) and nobody will be able to criticize it.
Furries just don't have the same money appeal - I dunno how much does a good fursuit cost but it's definitely not 200k of transition funds.