nobody sane would claim feminists aren't winning in a country where walking near women is a crime and looking at one gets you banned from public transport.
I did address it. I said nobody sane would believe feminists aren't winning in a country where looking at a woman gets you banned from public transport and walking near one gets you more jail time than violent assault.
Nobody sane believes that stupid stories like that are proof women aren't winning. You're basically saying that they are still victims while standing in a dominant position, having bent the law so much around them that they are nearly impervious in court unless the case receives significant public attention.
Women were never punished for hiding evidence from defence lawyers.
Women were never punished for trying to legalize murder when they do it. They succeeded.
Women were never punished for the ever-declining achievement of boys under their rule in education.
And again, you failed to address both Rotherham and your lies about Kyle Rittenhouse.
I did address it. I said nobody sane would believe feminists aren't winning in a country where looking at a woman gets you banned from public transport and walking near one gets you more jail time than violent assault.
Again, you failed. Nobody sane believes women are winning in a country that protects rape gangs.
And you ignored the Kyle Rittenhouse point. Jesus Christ, you're a pathetic creature.
Nobody sane believes that stupid stories like that are proof women aren't winning. You're basically saying that they are still victims while standing in a dominant position, having bent the law so much around them that they are nearly impervious in court unless the case receives significant public attention.
Women were never punished for hiding evidence from defence lawyers.
Women were never punished for trying to legalize murder when they do it. They succeeded.
Women were never punished for the ever-declining achievement of boys under their rule in education.