There has never been a political party in Europe willing to stand for even basic human rights for men. If anything like it arises, a controlled opposition party will take on the agenda and then turn hard towards supporting women.
What is there to address? It's obvious to everyone with sanity that no political party in Europe will defend men from women's endless onslaught of vile hatred.
Half of the European right is run by women themselves, for a start.
And you, an obvious nutjob, is the only one who has 'sanity'?
This is what you couldn't address: Yeah, except when it's not. And then you say that "it's to get votes from immigrants so that they can 'do more harm to men". That's what you said about Rotherham, after all, which alone is sufficient to debunk your whacked understanding of the world, if five brain cells aren't.
You just ignore stuff when you are incapable of addressing it. Like when you're called out for lying about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend (you'll ignore this too).
There's nothing to address. There has never been a rolling back of feminist gains.
The UK isn't in the EU so that story is irrelevant. Besides that, nobody sane would claim feminists aren't winning in a country where walking near women is a crime and looking at one gets you banned from public transport.
Pointing to likely hoaxes like Cologne and "femicide" cases is just a joke.
The fact that "femicide" is even a thing, in several European countries, proves my point.
There has never been a political party in Europe willing to stand for even basic human rights for men. If anything like it arises, a controlled opposition party will take on the agenda and then turn hard towards supporting women.
Just the usual gibberish without addressing anything.
What is there to address? It's obvious to everyone with sanity that no political party in Europe will defend men from women's endless onslaught of vile hatred.
Half of the European right is run by women themselves, for a start.
And you, an obvious nutjob, is the only one who has 'sanity'?
This is what you couldn't address: Yeah, except when it's not. And then you say that "it's to get votes from immigrants so that they can 'do more harm to men". That's what you said about Rotherham, after all, which alone is sufficient to debunk your whacked understanding of the world, if five brain cells aren't.
You just ignore stuff when you are incapable of addressing it. Like when you're called out for lying about Kyle Rittenhouse's girlfriend (you'll ignore this too).
There's nothing to address. There has never been a rolling back of feminist gains.
The UK isn't in the EU so that story is irrelevant. Besides that, nobody sane would claim feminists aren't winning in a country where walking near women is a crime and looking at one gets you banned from public transport.
Pointing to likely hoaxes like Cologne and "femicide" cases is just a joke.
The fact that "femicide" is even a thing, in several European countries, proves my point.