The leftist perspective is that whites have all this on the back of nonwhites. That basically a white person may live to 79 because his life was made easy by exploiting whoever. But you may know that.
It's odd talking about life expectancy in aggregate. Usually men and women are broken out because the disparity is so sharp. you may have a state with exceptionally long lived women that has a high average where the men are not living so remarkably long.
The leftist perspective is that whites have all this on the back of nonwhites.
That's a lie they have to insist on for every dimension of their intersectional oppression olympics no matter how obviously it isn't true:
My family never owned slaves. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family lived in non-slave states. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family actually fought for the North in the Civil War & all of the men died fighting to free the slaves. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I am literally a descendant of John Brown of John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry. WOW WE LOVE THAT GUY SO MUCH!!! BUT TOO BAD - HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family came here long after the Civil War. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I literally just got off the plane from Europe. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I literally just got off the plane from Europe, I'm Romanian, and my family is the descendants of white slaves. HOW DARE YOU IMPLY THAT WHITES HAVE EVER BEEN SLAVES!!!!! EVERYONE KNOWS THAT SLAVERY HAS NEVER EXISTED OUTSIDE THE AMERICAN SOUTH! HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
Intersectionality doesn't need to make sense. People love to believe that they are victims, so you don't need to make a convincing case. For intersectionality to serve its purpose for the Left, the targets - white men - don't need to agree with it, and they aren't expected to. The only people who need to agree are the tribal identity groups in the coalition, and they all choose to believe not because it's true, but because they stand to gain advantage from it.
The leftist perspective is that whites have all this on the back of nonwhites. That basically a white person may live to 79 because his life was made easy by exploiting whoever. But you may know that.
It's odd talking about life expectancy in aggregate. Usually men and women are broken out because the disparity is so sharp. you may have a state with exceptionally long lived women that has a high average where the men are not living so remarkably long.
That's a lie they have to insist on for every dimension of their intersectional oppression olympics no matter how obviously it isn't true:
My family never owned slaves. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family lived in non-slave states. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family actually fought for the North in the Civil War & all of the men died fighting to free the slaves. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I am literally a descendant of John Brown of John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry. WOW WE LOVE THAT GUY SO MUCH!!! BUT TOO BAD - HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
My family came here long after the Civil War. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I literally just got off the plane from Europe. HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
I literally just got off the plane from Europe, I'm Romanian, and my family is the descendants of white slaves. HOW DARE YOU IMPLY THAT WHITES HAVE EVER BEEN SLAVES!!!!! EVERYONE KNOWS THAT SLAVERY HAS NEVER EXISTED OUTSIDE THE AMERICAN SOUTH! HWHITE PRIVILEGE!
Intersectionality doesn't need to make sense. People love to believe that they are victims, so you don't need to make a convincing case. For intersectionality to serve its purpose for the Left, the targets - white men - don't need to agree with it, and they aren't expected to. The only people who need to agree are the tribal identity groups in the coalition, and they all choose to believe not because it's true, but because they stand to gain advantage from it.