Without those women, the Reimer study would have rotted in the depths of academia
Quite the assertion... anything to back that up? Because judging by his career that is far from reality:
Money introduced the terms gender role and sexual orientation and popularised the terms gender identity and paraphilia.
Seems like his work went on to have an impact on far more than “man-hating feminists”. He literally invented “gender-identity” and “sexual orientation” as concepts divorced from “mentally ill freaks”, and you blame women. Huh.
Money held the view that affectional paedophilia is caused by a surplus of parental love that became erotic, and is not a behavioural disorder. Rather, he took the position that heterosexuality is another example of a societal and therefore superficial, ideological concept.[54][55]
Who’s worse, the guy who turned these two babies into walking suicides or the women who wrote about his work?
I thought you'd jump on the opportunity to blame someone called (((Anke Ehrhardt))), Graphenium.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anke_Ehrhardt
Too easy, every single one of your threads is like that and susceptible to the same point.
That’s why I asked you a harder question.
It's actually an interesting question, because the answer isn't as obvious as you think.
Without those women, the Reimer study would have rotted in the depths of academia, only being noticed by people who study that field.
While he caused two deaths, how many did they cause by normalizing it?
Quite the assertion... anything to back that up? Because judging by his career that is far from reality:
Seems like his work went on to have an impact on far more than “man-hating feminists”. He literally invented “gender-identity” and “sexual orientation” as concepts divorced from “mentally ill freaks”, and you blame women. Huh.
Odd champion you’ve chosen to defend.
Why? Ehrhardt is a German last name.
I'm not good at noticing.